![]() |
An oysterman bring his freshly dredged oysters to shore. (click to enlarge) Fujifilm X-H2S; 16-55mmf/2.8 lens @ 34mm; 1/350th sec. @ f/5.6; ISO 320 |
X-H2S on left, Z7II on right (click to enlarge) |
![]() |
This was part of the AF testing I conducted. I made multiple exposures of this scene focusing on the same point. (click to enlarge) Fujifilm X-H2S; 10-24mm f/4 lens @ 10mm; 1/900th sec. @ f/8; ISO 320 |
This was the area of which I was most interested and most fearful. The autofocus is extremely fast and, to me, kind of amazing in many ways. In fact, the camera overall is very fast.
I am happy to report that the X-H2S passed all of my AF tests 100%! I photographed with several different lenses from 10mm to 400mm, from close up to infinity and from wide open to stopped down to f/16. I shot with AF-C, AF-S, Back Button AF-C, single point autofocus and zone focus. I feel confident the camera focuses accurately and consistently. But, there was an unexplainable anomaly when checking focusing distances.
This was weird (a technical term? lol). When I was checking focus accuracy, I had the distance scale visible on the LCD and EVF. I would half-press the shutter, momentarily note where the distance scale indicated the lens was focusing, then fully press the shutter, making the exposure. When I did this repeatedly at the same distance, I saw the some of the same variation as I did with the X-T4. This was very disheartening, to say the least. Now, here is the weird part. When I looked at each of those images in Lightroom Classic at 100% magnification all were in tack sharp focus. Not even a very slight deviation in sharpness. Explain this to me, please because I have no way of understanding this. Rick Walker believes that potentially the distance scale readings can’t keep up with the speed of the autofocus.
I tried the face/eye detect AF as well and it was flawless. I have here two images of an oysterman dumping oysters included here. I made about 50 images of him with face/eye detect AF turned on. The AF immediately locked in to his eye and even when his head was turned around and he was looking in the other direction, the AF box stayed locked on to his head. His eyes were in focus in 100% of those images. I’m impressed.
![]() |
This is a crop representing 10% of the image above. I'm pleased with the AF, detail, color rendition, sharpness and contrast. (click to enlarge) |
All in all, I am happy with the AF so far. I will continue to use the camera normally and continue to check my images at 100% for any focus variations of softness. So far, so good.
UPDATE: I think I need to add two comments about the bird detect AF. First, I don’t want to leave you with the impression that it is perfect and all you have to do is point the camera in the direction of a bird, press the shutter button and every image will be perfectly focused. It still takes skill and work on your part. This is Fujifilm’s first and initial attempt at subject recognition AF and it is very good, but I think with some refinement using firmware updates, it could improve. Second, I have not yet fully explored the best Custom AF-C settings to maximize my success rate for birds or other moving subjects. I have tried Custom Setting #2 and I created my own Custom Setting #6 to see how that effected the AF. I want to fully understand them and then set the best Custom AF-C Setting that works for me.
Features/EVF/IBIS
The 5.76mp electronic viewfinder (EVF) is excellent. The best I've ever used. It is bordering on believing it could be an optical viewfinder. I find it large, bright, detail clearly resolved, the ability to see into dark shadows and without any noticeable lag. I do have it set for 'frame rate priority (120 p)' but you can set it for 'low light priority', 'resolution priority' or 'frame rate priority (240P)'. I've only used the camera up to 10fps using the electronic shutter but the blackout free EVF is welcomed. The camera will record 40 blackout-free frames per second but I cannot imagine a situation where I would need making photographs with that speed. But, who knows?
The shutter is rated for 500,000 actuations. I suspect that kind of longevity is really not applicable to me. I can’t imagine keeping and using a single camera for long enough to make over a half million images. But what is welcomed about the shutter is that the stacked, backside illuminated sensor is very fast and I found myself using the electronic shutter without noticeable rolling shutter effect. I couldn’t do that in any of my other digital cameras. Another benefit of the speed of this camera.
This is a little thing but I like the change in strap lugs. I no longer have to keep those triangle shaped clips on the camera when I attach my Peak Design anchors. Thank you for the little things.
If you are one that demands dual memory card slots, the X-H2S has the primary slot configured for a CFExpress card. The secondary slot is for an SDXC UHS II card. You can use only one card and configure the camera to use only an SDXC card if you don't currently have a CFExpress card. But, you lose buffer capacity and speed and, I think the ability to capture video in its highest quality setting. Additionally, you will need a new card reader for the CFExpress cards. Also, the old XQD card readers will not work with CFExpress cards. But there is a bit of money saving news. You can simply use the SDXC memory card to transfer images to your computer. Slower but no hassles.
If you buy the X-H2S before September 4, 2022 and you live in the U.S., Fujifilm is giving you a free Delkin Black 325gb CFEpress card, so there's that.
I think all of the features of the X-T4 are kept for this camera. I use exposure autobracketing, the Pre-Shot feature as well as Focus Bracketing. The automated version of the Focus Bracketing from the X-T4 is carried over, thankfully. I find it very useful.
![]() |
The day was heavily overcast and the clouds told me rain was imminent. (click to enlarge) Fujifilm X-H2S; 16-55mmf/2.8 lens @ 20mm; 1/100th sec. @ f/16; ISO 320 |
I suggest you download and read the X-H2S's user manual, I did even before I received the camera. I found it worthwhile in trying understand upgrades and changes in functions. You can download it from Fujifilm here.
The only feature that I think is becoming somewhat mainstream that Fujifilm didn't include is the ability to pixel shift and make high resolution images. That allows the sensor to move a pixel or less in all directions, then the files are merged in-camera into one huge file, 150mp or so. Olympus, Sony and some others provide this. Maybe on the X-H2 or X-T5 since they will have 40mp sensors and more oriented toward landscape photography. (The latest rumor from FujiRumors.com is that the X-T5 will have this feature.)
Image Quality/Noise/Dynamic range/Color/Film Simulation
I think the image quality, noise profile, dynamic range and color are about the same as the X-T4's. They did expand the ISO range, however. I'm not a high ISO kind of photographer so that is inconsequential to me. I try to go no higher than ISO 6400 and that is only when there is an extreme condition. Also, as a user of Topaz DeNoise AI as well as DXO’s Prime Noise reduction and their camera/lens combination modules which correct for edge softness, vignetting, distortion and chromatic aberration, I’m fine with the image quality.
Happily, Fujifilm has given us their newest film simulation, Nostalgic Negative, which I like very much. This was previously only available on the GFX cameras. Another small item that deserves thanks. I would equate this film simulation look to what the street photographers of the 1940s, 50s and 60s who shot with color film achieved. It has a nice warm palette. I will play with this more. Nostalgic Negative is a nice compliment to Classic Chrome.
In the Field/Changing Settings/Seven custom settings on Top Dial
No surprises here. With the exception of the controls and dials, I felt the X-H2S was like most other Fujifilm cameras I have owned. I will again say that it is a bit bulkier than the X-T4. By bulkier I mean thicker from front to back. That was noticeable to me but it doesn't take but a time or two using it to feel comfortable in my hands.
The bird detection was simply amazing to me! I've never had a camera that had an autofocus feature like this, especially as good as it seems. I was looking for a lot of birds to photograph but there just weren't many in the areas I was in. However, for example, I saw a crow flying about 60 yards away from me. I swung the lens up, half-pressed the shutter and the camera instantly picked up and locked on to the crow. Wow! Another example is an egret fishing in a creek in ankle deep water about 200 yards from me. Again, the camera not only locked onto the egret, but locked on to its head only. A third example was a Great Blue Heron up on a high tree branch somewhat obscured by leaves and pine needles. The AF managed to find the heron and lock onto it. I did photograph a few flying birds, but I can't do the AF abilities justice with my rudimentary skills. However, I achieved some success where previously I would have had none. I have found birds-in-flight photography the most challenging I’ve tried.
I did find one situation where the bird detect really struggled. In fact, the normal AF struggled. I was trying to photograph a Great Blue Heron at the edge of a creek. The sky was very bright overcast, fully backlit, and the muddy bank was more like a mirror with some really high shine from the smooth surface. At first I thought it would be a relative easy AF target but the AF struggled. It wanted to lock onto the bright muddy bank instead of the bird. It did get 12 of the 19 exposures properly focused, but as I said, the system struggled. Afterwards, thinking about it, I’m not fully surprised it struggled as this scene would be a tough subject for any AF system to handle well.
![]() |
Nothing special about this image. Just a pleasant scene. (click to enlarge) Fujifilm X-H2S; 16-55mmf/2.8 lens @ 100mm; 1/0000th sec. @ f/4.5; ISO 320 |
Since I am using the aperture rings on my lenses, I can use the rear command dial for exposure compensation. That is, with aperture priority set. When I set shutter priority, the front command, by default, dial becomes the exposure compensation dial. I changed the command dial configuration in the menu so that no matter whether set for aperture or shutter priority, the rear dial is for exposure compensation. I don't want to have to do any mental gyrations when things are quickly unfolding in front of me. Same dial, consistent function.
Editing the Image Files
First, I noticed that the CFExpress card in my card reader became very hot! I've never felt any other card type to be so hot. I now know why they use heat sinks inside the card to help dissipate the heat. I suspect, during video recording the CFExpress card is another heat source besides the sensor itself.
I found editing the files in Lightroom Classic no different from any other Fujifilm files. The film simulations (Profiles) are there for you to use if desired. Everything else about editing the files were pretty much identical to the X-T4's files. Now, I may discover something being a bit different as time and more editing goes by, but preliminarily everything looks normal.
I found the colors looked good, the files responded to editing quite well and, as I said, the new Nostalgic Negative film simulation was enjoyable to use.
Also, I did shoot some JPEGs along with the RAW files for comparison. I set the in-camera settings (contrast, shadows, highlights, clarity, color, sharpening, etc) as I have in the X-T4 and the results looked basically the same. They were very pleasing. That said, I still would recommend shooting RAW to retain the most flexibility and potential from your files.
Video
I don't do video so I have no comment. Video seems to have a a tremendous number of settings available! I guess from what I've seen that is a very good thing!
That said, I re-programmed the red video button on the camera's top plate to toggle the subject recognition on and off. I have the rear most button on the to- plate set to toggle person/eye detection on and off.
Cost
The camera body retails in the United States for $2500. At first, at least to me, that seemed pretty high. That is in the territory of mid-range full frame digital cameras. But, I don’t believe sensor size should be the predominant factor in camera cost as it is not nearly as important to image quality as it once was. It is now only one factor of many when you compare cameras. The number of advanced features, artificial intelligence, autofocus, etc. play a very big role in calculating the worth of today’s digital cameras.
When you consider the ability and quality of the focusing system, a stacked, backside illuminated sensor (which to my knowledge is only found in a few new cameras, all but one selling for more than twice the price of the X-H2S), a brand new image processor four times more powerful than the last generation as well as the near top of the line video capabilities, it seems to me to be a fair price. I think the X-H2S’s competition are the Sony A1 and A7r4, the Sony A74, the Canon R5 and R6, Nikon Z9 as well as the new OMD Systems Olympus OM-1, which has a sensor half the size. When comparing the AF and video capabilities of these other camera's, the X-H2S is right up there with them, not quite equal in all respects, but I'll take it being just a little less capable for a price of $2500 instead of $6500, $6000, $5500 or $3800. I consider it a bargain.
![]() |
Watching paint peel! (click to enlarge) Fujifilm X-H2S; 16-55mmf/2.8 lens @ 16mm; 1/850th sec. @ f/8; ISO 320 |
Overall Impressions
I like using this camera. If feels good in my hand. All of the menus, dials and controls feel familiar since I use both Fujifilm cameras (menus and buttons are the same) and controls (very similar to Nikon's). I'm already comfortable with it. I haven't had to think about where a menu item is or where a button or dial is when I'm out and want to change a setting.
My biggest fear was this camera would suffer from the same issues as my X-T4. It does not. I found 100% of the images I shot of my test subjects and other scenes (with the exception of those pesky fast flying birds. But my skills are not up to the AF system yet.) were in sharp focus. I need much more practice and experience with the subject recognition so my success rate is not what I want it to be. In other words, I'm not a very good bird photographer—yet! I plan to be the more I use this camera. It has all the capability that I need to make the kinds of bird, wildlife, train, etc. photos I want to make.
I think the X-H2S is an excellent camera. I think it has a lot of potential. I think it has more than enough capability to fully satisfy my photographic needs. More than any other camera I've owned.
Who is this camera for?
If you are looking for better image quality than you get from an X-T3 or X-T4, this camera is not for you. You most likely won't see a difference. The two main strengths of this camera are its subject recognition and excellent super fast autofocus as well as its extensive state-of-the-art video capabilities. If you are a bird, wildlife, wedding, portrait, street, automobile racing, railroad or aircraft photographer, you will probably find this camera suits you very well. If you are a landscape and nature photographer, you might want to wait for the upcoming X-H2 or X-T4 with a 40mp sensor. Additionally, if you are into video, from everything I've seen and heard, you should be very happy with the results you will get from the X-H2S.
Will I keep it?
Yes. I am happy that I no longer have to seriously contemplate selling all my Fujifilm gear. Fujifilm has been the most enjoyable digital camera system I've owned or used. Two thumbs up for that. Additionally, I've a) needed a reliable replacement and/or backup for my X-T4. The X-T4 will now become my backup camera to the X-H2S. B) I've wanted a camera with subject detection AF as I like to photograph birds, wildlife, trains and family events and c), the 26mp sensor in the X-H2S will nicely compliment the 46mp sensor in my Nikon Z7II. The Fujifilm camera will most likely be used for general photography, birds and wildlife and the Nikon camera for landscapes, nature, macro and other subjects where I want high resolution and fine detail. Now that the X-H2S's controls are similar to Nikon's, the transition between the two becomes moot.
So there you have it. In my opinion, Fujifilm has produced an excellent camera with what I think has great potential. It is not the best camera out there but it 'punches well above its weight," so to speak, when you compare this camera's cost and feature set against its much more expensive competitors.
Here are some additional images I made with this camera over the last week. As I mentioned above, I’ve included exposure data for those who might be interested. All photos were made handheld.
![]() |
(click to enlarge) Fujifilm X-H2S; 16-55mmf/2.8 lens @ 22mm; 1/140th sec. @ f/16; ISO 320 |
![]() |
Colorful crab pots with their identifying floats. (click to enlarge) Fujifilm X-H2S; 16-55mmf/2.8 lens @ 18mm; 1/60th sec. @ f/11; ISO 160 |
![]() |
Found treasure! Some people collect this old barnacle covered bottles. (click to enlarge) Fujifilm X-H2S; 16-55mmf/2.8 lens @ 28mm; 1/1250th sec. @ f/11; ISO 320 |
![]() |
(click to enlarge) Fujifilm X-H2S; 16-55mmf/2.8 lens @ 22mm; 1/340th sec. @ f/16; ISO 320 |
![]() |
This kind of target is very easy for the AF Bird Detect. (click to enlarge) Fujifilm X-H2S; 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 lens @ 400mm (~600mm FF); 1/1000th sec. @ f/5.6; ISO 160 |
![]() |
As prevalent as oysters are in my area, I don't eat them. No thank you. (click to enlarge) Fujifilm X-H2S; 16-55mmf/2.8 lens @ 44mm; 1/680th sec. @ f/5.6; ISO 320 |
![]() |
These oyster can't get any fresher. They just were offloaded from the boat! (click to enlarge) Fujifilm X-H2S; 16-55mmf/2.8 lens @ 34mm; 1/280th sec. @ f/8; ISO 320 |
I hope you found this post informative. I will be using the camera regularly and if and when I use and/or test other functions, I’ll update you on what I did and the results of any tests.
Fuji deserves accolades. They’ve done a very nice job in creating this camera.
If you have a question or comment about this camera, please leave it below.
Many thanks for this great "review". I am very intrigued to add this camera also to my arsenal (besides the excellent Z7II) as I always loved Fuji cameras and lenses and would like to get back into wildlife and bird photography again with it and that wonderful 150-600.
ReplyDeleteBest regards
Peter
Thanks Peter. As I use the camera more and better understand the Custom AF-C settings, I think my success rate will improve. Also, this is Fujifilm’s first attempt at this sophisticated AF system. I’m positive that firmware updates with AF refinements will come in the future.
DeleteVery pleased to read your experience, considering your frustration with the X-T4. I'm picking up the X-H2s myself and expect to make it my primary camera, with my X-T4 as backup!
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. I am still enjoying my X-H2S. It is a terrific camera. I still think the subject detection AF can be improved a bit to better compete with Sony, Nikon and Canon and I am hoping that Fujifilm will give us another firmware update soon. But, all in all, I'm loving it! No complaints.
Delete