For all of you photographers who have only shot with digital cameras, have you ever wanted to challenge yourself, test yourself or try something different to jumpstart your creative juices? I have something for you to try.
I’m sure most of you are familiar with the challenge to photograph with only one lens, one focal length. That exercise is relatively common. I’ve written about it before, here and here. Some say using a single focal length is beneficial to your creativity, others say detrimental. I see both sides of the argument. By doing so, you either learn to fit everything in your photographic world into that one focal length or walk away. As an aside, it is quite different and I am experiencing some of that with my Fujifilm X100VI. More on that in the near future.
I have a slightly different challenge for you. My challenge to you is to photograph with only one ISO. Not a high ISO where you can manipulate the controls on your camera to capture an image in almost every situation. No, a relatively slow ISO. Nothing over ISO 400. Just one. For everything. Day and night. Bright light and low light. Better yet imagine you can only shoot with Kodachrome 64. That is the real challenge.
For most of my film days, I shot 35mm Kodachrome 64 for slides, either Kodacolor 100 or 120 Kodak Vericolor III (in my medium format camera) for prints. For black & white, I normally used Tri-X and Panatomic-X film.
Here are the ISOs, or more properly the ASAs (film speed) of those films:
-Kodachrome 64 ASA 64 (but often shot at ASA 50 so as to not blow out the highlights as well as have more saturated colors)
-Kodacolor 100 ASA 100 (sometime 80 to ensure robust shadow detail)
-Kodak Vericolor III ASA 160 (but often shot at ASA 125 for full shadow detail)
-*Kodak Tri-X ASA 400 (often shot from ASA 200-320 for more shadow detail and less film grain)
-**Kodak Panatomic-X ASA 32
If you are a color shooter, pick one of those color films. If you really want to challenge yourself, pick ISO 64. If you are a black & white shooter, pick one of those two films. Now, set you digital camera’s ISO dial to that ISO and shoot with only at that ISO. No ISO 1600, 3200, 6400, Auto ISO, etc. Not even ISO 800. See how doing this will stretch you photographically and challenge you to capture images and create your photographs using ‘slow film’ like your analog forefathers. Try to overcome how a ‘slow film speed’ reduces your options for shutter speeds and small apertures and see if you can find ways to beat the limitations you’ll encounter.
I think it would be fun. See what you can do only shooting simulated Kodachrome 64 as the Life and Look magazine photographers did. Shoot, even on the brightest of days, as if you only had Tri-X at ASA 400 in your camera like the majority of photojournalists did and see what you can do when the light is low.
Try it and then come back here and let us know your experience. I think you will find the limitation frustrating but enlightening at the same time. I think this could help you be a better photographer as it will make you think and solve new problems about which you haven’t had to previously worry.
*Tri-X was also often ‘pushed’ by underexposing, say ASA 1600, then over-developed to get adequate density in the negatives in very low light.
**I also shot Pan-X at ASA 50 when using Fred Picker’s Zone VI developer.
Join me over at my website, https://www.dennismook.com.
Thanks for looking. Enjoy!
Dennis A. Mook
All content on this blog is © 2013-2025 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.
"Ah, the good old days..." And as my Mother told me "There wasn't anything good about them:.
ReplyDeleteIt is amazing that we were able to make the images that we made. It was not just the film choices, color or b&w, low or high speed, the only stabilization was a tripod. Zoom lenses were of poor quality but very useful for color slides as you could "crop" in the camera when composing. You used polaroid as a way to check exposure, color balance, or composition before exposing the film. No rear monitor to check those things like today. You only really knew after processing the film in the night after the shoot. And then there was the exposure compensation tables for closeups, shutter testers for leaf shutters, color temperature meters and filter packs, it all makes my head swim.
I just made an excellent large print of a landscape with spectacular clouds. The image file was from an Iphone. Who could have imagined the great tools and simple processes we have today?
Amen! ~Dennis
DeleteThat's a great exercise, Dennis. However, you might want to rate your K64 at 80 rather than 50 if you didn't want to blow out the highlights.
ReplyDeleteDave, you are absolutely right. I messed up. I’m sure you pretty much did the same thing back in our film days—underexpose slide film slightly and overexpose negative film. Insurance. Thanks for catching that. ~Dennis
Delete