I don’t know about you but I am very thankful for not only the editing software that is available to edit my image files, but also the AI based enhancing features and AI based plug-ins that supplement and improve my editing abilities. I’m mainly talking about Lightroom’s Enhancement features, DXO’s PureRaw for noise reduction, elimination of distortion, vignetting, chromatic aberrations as well as differential sharpening and Topaz for Photo AI and Gigapixel AI, each of these I can use whenever an image needs tweaked more than my primary editing software can provide.
Each of these programs give me tools to improve my images in ways that were never before available. I wish I had these kinds of tools years ago. That said, I'm glad I very seldom if ever deleted any of my image files as I now often go back and 'fix' the ones which I wouldn't show due to some technical failure (usually on my part) using one of these tools so they now can be properly edited and 'corrected.'
However, there is at least one hidden sometimes unnoticed cost when using these features and plug-ins. When I have used them for improving an image file, typically a raw file, the software will convert that raw file into a new DNG (digital negative) file, which is generic and retains most of the attributes of the original raw file for additional editing. But...
Have you noticed how large the resultant DNG files are? Take a look below at the results of a short experiment I conducted recently. I wanted to see for myself how much larger the newly created DNG file is after I processed the original raw file in one of these supplemental editing software programs. Also, none of the AI based processing involved upsizing the original raw file, only noise reduction. The before and after files are the same pixel dimensions.
In my Lightroom Classic catalog, I retrieved a typical raw file from each of my four digital cameras and then processed that file in Lightroom Classic’s DeNoise feature as well as Topaz Photo AI’s noise reduction feature. No other processing was done. I then noted the size of the original raw file and the new size of the same file after the noise reduction was applied.
Here is the results:
Fujifilm X-T5 40mp sensor (raw compressed)
Native RAF raw file 43.6MB
Adobe DeNoise DNG file 93.9MB
Topaz Photo AI DNG file 233.4MB
File size increase. 215.3%—535.3%
OM Systems OM-1 Mark II 20mp sensor (raw, no compression setting available)
Native ORF raw file 21.3MB
Adobe DeNoise DNG file 56.0MB
Topaz Photo AI DNG file 118.8MB
File size increase. 262.9%—557.7%
Nikon Zf 24mp sensor (raw compressed)
Native NEF raw file 33.4MB
Adobe DeNoise DNG file 67.6MB
Topaz Photo AI DNG file 143.1MB
File size increase. 202.3%—428.4%
Nikon Z8 46mp sensor (raw compressed)
Native NEF raw file 63.2MB
Adobe DeNoise DNG file 108.7MB
Topaz Photo AI DNG file 266.6MB
File size increase. 171.9%—421.8%
WOW! I was shocked. I knew the DNG files were larger but had not paid much attention to the file size increase before now.
I won’t stop using these features and plug-ins but also I won’t develop the habit to run more of my files through these programs than is necessary. As in the past I’ll be judicious in which files get which treatment so I won’t fill up my hard drives unnecessarily causing me to buy larger hard drives prematurely.
So there you have it. The hidden cost of using AI based plug-ins is file sizes up to 4 to 5 times larger than original files therefore using up to 4 to 5 times the hard drive space normally used for each file.
I found this interesting and thought some of you may benefit from this little tidbit of information. Just something to keep in the back of your mind when editing.
Join me over at my website, https://www.dennismook.com.
I have also noted the increase in size. Finding myself saving more and more adjusted files as jpgs when I am satisfied with the end product. Of course I still have the original raw file saved as it came out of the camera.
ReplyDeleteDennis, 3 dish antennas ???
ReplyDeleteThree satellite dishes, two window air conditioners, peeling paint and rotted and missing wood at the soffits! Gotta have that TV however! Lol. ~Dennis
DeleteThe NEF 46mp file size really takes off when it is processed through Lightroom/Negative Lens Pro/Topaz/into Photoshop. The resulting file can easily exceed a GB. There must be a lot of activity going on under the hood of NLP and Topaz.
ReplyDeleteThe resulting file from the camera scan of a good 4x5 negative is amazing. Enlarge the image to sizes exceeding 30x40 and you only reveal more detail that was previously too small to be discerned in a 19" print.
The real value is that multiple image compositions could be revealed by cropping from the original image. That is unless one prints wall murals.