![]() |
A male Belted Kingfisher taking flight. (click any image to enlarge) OM-1 Mark II; 150-600mm f/5-6.3 lens @ 600mm; 1/2500th sec. @ f/6.3; ISO 1250 |
I have been suffering a bit from the winter doldrums. It wasn't too bad, usually worse in mid-February, but I wanted to do something now to pull myself out of my creative rut, so to speak. So, I decided to take a break from the home routine and take a short photographic road trip.
Each year for the past 20 years, a few photographer friends and I have met most of the time in mid-December at the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge on Assateague Island on Virginia's Eastern Shore. The object is to photograph local and migrating birds of various species. The other guys photograph birds much more frequently than I do but I enjoy the experience and challenge of photographing them on occasion. Photographing birds is one of the more challenging types of photography, in my opinion. Due to some extenuating circumstances last month, our December trip was canceled. However, I decided to make the trip, albeit solo, a two weeks ago.
![]() |
OM-1 Mark II; 150-600mm f/5-6.3 lens @ 600mm; 1/2000th sec. @ f/6.3; ISO 800 |
Some of you older readers may of heard of the 1947 book, Misty of Chincoteague by Marguerite Henry. You can read more about the history and plot of the novel here. The novel made the town of Chincoteague famous, mainly for its annual "pony swim" and auction of the wild ponies that live in the wildlife refuge. But I digress.
The day that I arrived in the NWR the light was miserable. The temperature was in the high 30ºs F with heavy cloud cover and a stiff wind from the north. Nonetheless, I set out on my usual activities looking for wading birds, shore birds, waterfowl, ducks, geese and swans as well as other migrating birds. I almost had the entire refuge to myself. Unfortunately, there was a general dearth of birds but I expected that. What I didn't expect was for most of the small waterways and canals in which the wading birds feed to be frozen over. Additionally, most of the water surface of the larger ponds in which the geese and swans frequent were frozen as well. In all of my years going to Chincoteague, I had never seen ice nor snow and there was a lot of it this time. Regardless, I still had the solitude and pleasure of spending a couple of days in nature.
Day two was a bright blue sky kind of day. That helped with using lower ISOs to capture my subjects and, since I wasn't doing any landscape photography, the clear blue sky wasn't a factor. Landscape photographers always like character in their skies.
As far as photo gear goes, I took two kits mainly because I wanted to compare the experience using both and figure out which one I liked using better. Additionally, which I have not yet done, I wanted to calculate my 'hit rate' with the two kits to see if I was more successful with one versus the other.
The two kits I used were:
Nikon Z8
Nikon Zf (as a backup)
Nikon 180-600mm lens
OM-1 Mark II
OM-1 (as a backup)
150-600mm lens
![]() |
OM-1 Mark II; 150-600mm f/5-6.3 lens @ 328mm; 1/2000th sec. @ f/6.3; ISO 3200 |
In the end, I used the OM system more than the Nikon system. It wasn’t because one performed better than the other or one’s image quality was superior to the other's. I believe the reason was the effective field of view of 1200mm (full frame) of the OM 150-600mm lens allowed me to capture birds that were farther away—ones that I would not normally photograph. I made shots with that combination where with the Nikon I didn’t as 600mm just wasn't long enough. Additionally, even using the Z8 in DX Mode (1.5X crop) with an effective full frame field of view of 900mm still didn't result in the reach to photograph many of the birds. That 1200mm focal length equivalent, I would say, was the clear advantage for using the OM system. (Note: DX Mode on the Z8 generates a 19.3mp file, almost an identical resolution to the OM-1’s 20.2mp. So there is little advantage.)
In the end, I saw a pretty wide variety of birds, just not a lot of them close enough to photograph. I saw more Bufflehead ducks than I've ever seen in Chincoteague in the past. However, for the first year, I saw no Snow Geese. Not a one. Also, I saw only 12 Tundra Swans but they were too far away to photograph.
![]() |
One of the wild ponies of Chincoteague. OM-1 Mark II; 150-600mm f/5-6.3 lens @ 600mm; 1/2500th sec. @ f/6.3; ISO 1000 |
All in all, I had a nice trip and made some satisfying photographs.
Here are a few more of the images I made. None of these posted here are portfolio worthy. They are mostly just record shots. Ordinary. But the trip was not about creating portfolio worthy images. It was about the experience.
![]() |
Directing the choir? OM-1 Mark II; 150-600mm f/5-6.3 lens @ 600mm; 1/2000th sec. @ f/6.3; ISO 800 |
![]() |
OM-1 Mark II; 150-600mm f/5-6.3 lens @ 600mm; 1/2000th sec. @ f/6.3; ISO 1000 |
![]() |
OM-1 Mark II; 150-600mm f/5-6.3 lens @ 150mm; 1/2500th sec. @ f/5; ISO 10,000 |
![]() |
Nikon Z8; 180-600mm f5.6-6.3 lens @ 600mm; 1/1600th sec. @ f/9; ISO 1400 |
![]() |
Nikon Z8; 180-600mm f5.6-6.3 lens @ 600mm; 1/2000th sec. @ f/6.3; ISO 9000 |
![]() |
OM-1 Mark II; 150-600mm f/5-6.3 lens @ 600mm; 1/2000th sec. @ f/6.3; ISO 500 |
![]() |
OM-1 Mark II; 150-600mm f/5-6.3 lens @ 600mm; 1/2000th sec. @ f/6.3; ISO 500 |
My brief trip accomplished what I wanted it to accomplish—it got my creative juices flowing, allowed me to practice some rusty bird photography and enjoy some quiet time in nature. I found the short road trip time well spent.
I can highly recommend some shutter therapy to cure those winter blues.
Thanks for looking. Enjoy!
Dennis A. Mook
All content on this blog is © 2013-2025 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.
I see you have moved to OM-1 ii from OM-1. What differences have you noticed?
ReplyDeleteLarry, the OM-1 Mark II has a few improvements over the OM-1. First and most important is the subject detection AF. I found my ‘hit’ rate is higher than with any previous camera. I was frustrated previously but pleased with my hit rate now. Second, if there are multiple subjects and the subject detect locks onto one that is not the one I want, I have a button programmed to push and rotate a dial to move the AF box to the subject I want and the camera will stay locked onto that subject. Third, I use SH2 burst mode for high speed shooting for birds, high speed trains, etc. The OM-1 forced me to use a minimum 25fps to have blackout free shooting. Too high a frame rate for me. The Mark II allows blackout free shooting at 16.7fps. Close enough to my desired 15fps. Fourth, there is an extra stop of neutral density for the Live ND feature. I have used that. 7 stops, I believe. Works well. Fifth, I like the idea of the graduated neutral density filter feature. A minor thing is the menu has been reconfigured to place both the people subject detect and the other subjects detection mode (birds, animals, trains, planes, etc.) all under the same menu item. When I want to turn it on or off or change modes, I push a button and rotate the dial and it allows me to scroll through the various subjects. That makes much more sense than having persons separate than the other subjects. I’m sure there is one or two more items but they aren’t coming to mind. All in all, I’m very pleased with the improvements in function and ease of operation of the newer model. ~Dennis
DeleteGlad you were able to enjoy some shutter time. I really like winter light on the rare occasions that Ohio gets some sun LOL.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure if you've addressed this in the past, but what is your criteria for what is portfolio worthy? In this case, does that mean that none of these will end up on your website. Is it subjective or do you have defined checklists that a photo must meet? - Jim
Jim, thanks for the question. I don’t think I have a specific definition for what may be ‘portfolio worthy’ for me. The term may mean different things to different people. For me, I suppose, the image must be special, out of the ordinary and evoke a strong emotion. It could be the subject matter itself, the light, color contrasts, an unusual juxtaposition or a living thing (person or animal) that is posed or doing something that is unusual. As I said, I don’t have a definition. But when I see an image that is portfolio worthy, I’ll know it. I don’t update my website nearly as much as I should, but if I were to add any of these images, it would most likely be the one at the top of the post. ~Dennis
Delete