 |
Too many choices. Which boots are you going to wear today? (click to enlarge) No, these are not mine! lol. |
The other day I was thinking (again) about owning too many camera systems, too many cameras and too many lenses. When I go out to photograph questions always arise, “What do I think I’ll be photographing today?” "Which camera system do I take?" "Which lenses do I think I'll need?" "Should I take a full bag of gear or just take a camera and a couple of lenses to keep things small, lightweight and more comfortable?" Answering those kinds of questions every time I go out to photograph get tedious at best and down right annoying at worst.
I grant you these are questions and irritations most people don’t have the luxury of having so I do also remind myself how fortunate I am to own more than one camera system. In other words, I can’t complain too much.
That got me to thinking about a book I read several years ago entitled, "The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less." As I decided to do a little research on this subject, a thought occurred. I wondered what response I would get if used one of the Artificial Intelligence search engines to answer my questions? In this case, I chose Microsoft's Co-Pilot. Here is the result.
Me:
What is the paradox of choice? Why does too much choice degrade the experience?
Microsoft Co-Pilot:
The paradox of choice is a concept introduced by psychologist Barry Schwartz in his book The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. It suggests that while having some choice is beneficial, having too many options can lead to negative outcomes such as anxiety, regret, and dissatisfaction.
Here are a few reasons why too much choice can degrade the experience:
Decision Fatigue: Making decisions requires cognitive effort.
When faced with too many options, people can become mentally exhausted, leading to poorer decision-making and increased stress.Regret and Second-Guessing: With more choices, the likelihood of regretting a decision increases. People may constantly wonder if they made the best choice or if another option would have been better.
Opportunity Cost: More choices mean more potential opportunities missed. This can lead to a feeling of loss or dissatisfaction because people focus on the benefits of the options they didn’t choose.
Increased Expectations: With more options, expectations rise. If the chosen option doesn’t meet these heightened expectations, it can lead to disappointment.
Maximizers vs. Satisficers: People who strive to make the best possible choice (maximizers) tend to be less satisfied with their decisions compared to those who settle for a choice that is “good enough” (satisficers). More options make it harder for maximizers to feel confident in their decisions. (Note: I didn't know 'satisficer' was an actual word but it means:
to pursue the minimum satisfactory condition or outcome, according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary.)
In essence, while choice is often associated with freedom and autonomy, too much choice can paradoxically reduce our overall happiness and satisfaction.
Does this concept resonate with any experiences you’ve had?
Me:
Yes, too many camera and lens choices.
Microsoft Co-Pilot:
I can definitely understand that! The world of cameras and lenses is vast, with so many brands, models, and specifications to consider. It can be overwhelming to sift through all the options and find the right one for your needs.
Here are a few tips to help navigate through the choices:
Define Your Needs: Think about what you’ll primarily use the camera for. Are you into landscape photography, portraits, sports, or video? This can help narrow down the type of camera and lenses you need.
Set a Budget: Having a clear budget can limit your options to a more manageable number. It also helps prevent overspending on features you might not need.
Research and Reviews: Look for reviews and comparisons online. Websites like DPReview and YouTube channels dedicated to photography gear can provide in-depth insights.
Try Before You Buy: If possible, visit a camera store to handle the cameras and lenses. Sometimes, the feel and ergonomics of the gear can make a big difference.
Consider Future Growth: Think about whether you might want to expand your gear in the future. Some camera systems offer more flexibility and a wider range of lenses and accessories.
Ask for Recommendations: Join photography forums or social media groups. Experienced photographers can offer valuable advice based on their own experiences.
I found those responses by the Microsoft Co-Pilot AI engine interesting. The answer to the first question may be more enlightening than the answer to my second question, which is pretty much using plain logic and decision-making.
Taking things one step farther, I opened Chat GPT and asked:
Me:
How can one reduce a large number of choices into smaller numbers so as to increase one’s satisfaction?
ChatGPT:
Reducing a large number of choices into smaller, more manageable sets can help increase satisfaction by making the decision process less overwhelming and more focused. Here are some strategies to achieve this:
1. Set Clear Criteria • Identify Priorities: Determine the key factors that matter most to you in your decision. For example, if you’re choosing a hotel, your priorities might be location, price, and amenities. • Eliminate Options: Discard any options that don’t meet your essential criteria. This will narrow the choices to those that are most relevant to your needs.
2. Limit the Number of Options • Set a Limit: Decide in advance how many options you’re willing to consider. For example, you might decide to only look at the top five options based on your criteria. • Use Filtering Tools: If shopping online, use filters to limit the number of items displayed. This can automatically reduce choices based on price, rating, features, etc.
3. Categorize and Compare • Group Similar Options: Break down choices into categories (e.g., by brand, style, or price range). This allows you to compare similar options more easily. • Compare Side by Side: Focus on comparing two or three options at a time rather than evaluating all choices at once. This method simplifies the decision-making process.
4. Seek Recommendations • Ask for Expert Advice: Consult with experts or use curated lists and reviews to identify top choices. This can drastically reduce the number of options you need to consider. • Use Social Proof: Look for what others have chosen or rated highly. Sometimes the popular choice is popular for a good reason.
5. Set a Time Limit • Time-Box Decisions: Give yourself a specific amount of time to make a decision. This prevents you from overanalyzing and helps you focus on what’s most important. • Embrace Imperfection: Accept that no choice is perfect and that sometimes, a good decision is better than no decision.
6. Use the “Satisficing” Approach • Opt for “Good Enough”: Instead of seeking the perfect option, choose the one that meets your basic requirements and makes you happy. This approach, known as “satisficing,” can reduce stress and lead to greater satisfaction.
7. Delegate or Randomize • Let Someone Else Decide: If a choice isn’t particularly important, delegate the decision to someone else or use a random method to select an option. • Flip a Coin: For minor decisions where you’re indifferent between options, a coin flip can be a quick way to move forward. By implementing these strategies, you can reduce the overwhelming nature of too many choices and increase your overall satisfaction with the decisions you make.
Again, the "Artificial Intelligence" responses are interesting but less than instructional for all except those who don't think things through.
Do you suffer from too many choices when it comes to your gear and which camera and lenses you'll take out? As I mentioned above this is a 'first world' problem and I'm actually thankful that I can afford three different systems.
Over the past few years I've really strived to sell off a lot of my gear and I have, only to buy other gear. I guess my fundamental problem is I just like to use different cameras with different sized sensors and different lenses for different kinds of photography. That said, I predict that one day in the future, I'll be scaling back my photography and narrowing down my gear to one system. Until that day comes, I guess I'll just have to deal with the degraded experiences of too many choices.
Join me over at my website, https://www.dennismook.com.
Thanks for looking. Enjoy!
Dennis A. Mook
All content on this blog is © 2013-2024 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.
Dennis,
ReplyDeleteI am 83 years young, and came to a similar conclusion a few years ago. I have only a Fuji X-T3 with their 16-80mm lens, and there's literally nothing else I need to carry around with me. My photography is fun, and I really enjoy it. You are never too old to learn! Good luck and best wishes to you and yours.
Congratulations on making it to 83. You have me by 11 years but I plan on making it longer than that! Fingers crossed. Also, thank you for your comment and encouraging words. Well spoken. As I scale back my photography in the future, I’ll reduce my kit to one camera and maybe a couple of lenses. It’s in my long range plans. ~Dennis
DeleteAs long as you take along the matching lenses with your camera of choice that day you can't go wrong. There was a time that I used at least five different systems. Some film, some digital. The last ten years I exclusively used Olympus m43 which made life a lot easier. There are many people that complain about their menus but that is probably because they also use other systems as well and Olympus is a bit different from the rest.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment. I now own an OM-1 and the menu system is so much better than the old Olympus menu system. That said, I didn’t have many issues with the old system except when some feature was grayed out and I couldn’t figure out why. In the new menu system, it tells you why. A nice improvement. ~Dennis
DeleteI‘m in the same situation: I love shooting with my Fuji gear a lot, but in some situations I often take photos, like theatre photography or sometimes wildlife (especially birds in our garden), I‘m not really happy with the Fuji, so I bought a second hand Nikon Z6 and was surprised! AF much better, little less noise, colors in LED light conditions better, RAW files are more easier to handle. And here is the trouble: APS-C is my favourite because of size and weight, FF has more points in picture quality (not in all cases, but in special conditions). For me Nikon was the perfect system, because you can have both! But the APS-C cams are not as good, as they should be. So I hope of a midclass Z-70 for travelling and wildlife with the options to use the FF lenses for both. For this I still wait….and wait. But when I touch my little Fuji XE-3…..I feel like I found what I want! headache all the time. Greets from Germany.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your thoughtful comment. Indeed, you seem conflicted between the two systems. I think it won’t be long until Nikon introduces a successor to the APS=C Z50 with much better autofocus and an updated image processor. That might be your answer. The Z6 has one of the best sensors around when it comes to image quality, noise and especially dynamic range. I have a Zf, which has basically the same sensor but with the latest image processor as well as the AF of the Z8/Z9 and I continue to be amazed at the quality of images it produces. I hope things in Germany are doing well. Being a former Leica shooter until I moved to digital in 2001, I would love to get to Wetzlar and tour the factory. I’m saddened that in today’s world, there is no way I can afford a Leica now. ~Dennis
DeleteI remember seeing used boots like that in Tucson in the 1980's. I wondered if the stores would take used boots as trade in on new-er ones like a used car lot. I wish I had asked.
ReplyDeleteThere was an apparent strategy way, even before the 1960's when I started with quality cameras, to corral photo buyers into a one brand fits all. The "system" camera strategy (think Lionel model trains) was to make an accessory for any possible type of photography so the buyer just kept expanding the kit for their Nikon or Leica or whatever. No matter the subject, the hapless photographer (speaking about the amateur market) just kept on buying the next gadget. Once locked in to the system theory, then the buyer kept buying all the new lenses.
Those who had to photograph a variety of subjects in order to keep their paying customers pleased and make a living knew that different jobs required different tools. A small town studio had a large format portrait setup. A sheet film camera was required because few professional retouchers were willing to work on roll film negatives. That changed some later. An extensive roll film camera kit was necessary for nearly all out of the studio jobs. A modular 4x5 view camera was necessary for any architectural job or for a group photo of the local girls school if the faces had to be recognizable. The only time a 35mm camera was used was when the client needed slides for a presentation. Even then, slides were often made from roll or sheet film negatives.
The point I am trying to get to is that these professionals always had a variety of camera brands in their equipment closets. They did not do what I tend to do. That is to outfit parallel systems for camera to be used for the same subjects. I have a good Nikon Z7 outfit for everything but telephoto. I also have a good OM or Olympus outfit for telephoto. Since I kept on buying, I not only have telephotos for the Olympus, I have a bunch of the other lenses too. Add to that the now vintage dslr's that I never got rid of because of the used prices. So, I am again a candidate for a mental therapy because of hoarding camera equipment. I offered vintage camera kits to nieces and nephews. All but one said they were satisfied with their cellphone cameras. That one said "An old camera would be cool!". If she still feels that way today, she might become the recipient of a Nikon D200 which cost over $1,000 back in the day.
Oh, I am really impressed with the Ai evaluation and response.
Thank you for your extensive and thoughtful comment as well as the history lesson. I started photographing passionately in 1971 and I think, from what you wrote, you may have started before me. More than one camera type or sensor size or system is fine in my judgment. Different tools for different jobs. I do find it interesting the number of comments and emails I receive from readers who have both Nikon and OM/Olympus kits. That combination seems popular. Like you, I tend to hoard cameras as well. I have many older ones and I keep them not only because sale or trade-in value is pitiful, but for nostalgic reasons as well as to admire their build quality, mechanical precision and haptics. Again, thanks for your comment. ~Dennis
Delete