Friday, February 9, 2024

I'm Upgrading My Birding And Wildlife Kit


These days I find myself much more often going out and attempting to photograph birds and wildlife.  In the past, I rarely (once a year or so) practiced these types of photography so I couldn't convince myself to spend the money and invest in top-tier gear that performs at a very high level for the very limited amount of time I spend photographing these subjects.  However, since now I going out much more and shooting birds-in-flight, "birds on a stick," as its called, as well as wildlife, I decided to upgrade my kit.  

Photographing birds is one of the hardest genres of photography I've ever explored and I haven't been entirely happy with my previous results.  I had done a lot of research on 'best practices' as well as often times went out and practiced weekly.  More often than not I found myself disappointed with the percentage of 'sharply focused' images I brought home.  By ‘sharply focused’ I mean the bird’s or animal’s eye is pin sharp.  Not almost pin sharp and certainly not seriously out of focus.  A sharp eye is the test.

This type of less than acceptable result was again reinforced last week when I spent three days photographing birds at the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge on Virginia’s Eastern Shore.  I was using my OM-1 and 100-400mm lens.  Although I came home with some very nice images, I certainly didn’t reach the level of success I would expect.  Yes, evidently gear does matter sometimes.  

In my previous several bird photography outings with both my OM-1 and Fujifilm X-H2S using the 150-600mm lens, I used absolutely my best technique, never shot with a shutter speed slower than 1/1600th second (mostly 1/2500th second), shot in bursts of 5 to 10 images with bird subject detection activated but found that often times the AF would lock on to the bird, show me the green box (meaning the target is in sharp focus), then the AF would drift out of focus but still showing the green box, then back in focus all during a single burst.  I’m talking about birds standing still, not flying quickly across the sky.  Other times the AF would lock on for one or more bursts and the AF would never drift off the eye.  That was very frustrating when editing my images after returning home.  So, gear can matter.  Well, I think it is more about the sophistication of the technology in the camera than fundamentally the camera itself.  Again, this happened with both my OM and Fujifilm systems.

This repeatedly occurring resulted in me deciding that I would sell the X-H2S and the 150-600mm lens.  I would keep the OM-1 because I will use it primarily for all kinds of other photography, particularly travel photography.  My plan would include also selling my Nikon Z7II and, sometime in the near future, acquiring a Nikon Z8.  The Z8's capabilities when it comes to the technology inside the camera, from everything I've researched, is on a much higher level.

I want to make it clear that the Fujifilm X-H2S combined with the 150-600mm lens as well as the OM-1 combined with the 100-400mm lens are both decent camera/lens combinations for photographing birds and wildlife.  Decent.  They just don’t allow me to reach the level of success I personally desire.  I feel they are holding me back.  There are too many misses when it comes to locking on to birds and staying locked on.  There’s nothing wrong with either and I will use the OM kit in the future.  Just not for bird photography unless I’m traveling and am restricted to size and weight of my kit.  If I do use it for birding in the future, I’ll know what results to expect.

Because of this lack of a level of success that I want to achieve I decided to make a move to get a camera whose capabilities should increase my success rate.  I have thought about this for months but had been holding off making a move.  I know, I know.  We’re still thinking it's not about the gear but about the photographer.  Well, it is and it isn't.  You can't very well photograph a Formula 1 race with a Holga camera, can you?

So...recently (before I thought I would), I bought a Nikon Z8.  I couldn't resist.  I am on Nikon's email list and I received an email about their refurbished gear being on sale.  The Z8 was available at an $800 discount.  That was too hard to pass up.  I've purchased many refurbished items from Nikon (Olympus as well) in the past and all have been in "like new" condition and I've never had a problem.  So, I didn't worry about purchasing this camera from them.  Yes, it comes with a warranty.

Just a few days ago (February 6, 2024), Nikon announced the availability of Z8 firmware version 2.0.  This firmware version not only places the Z8's AF on fully the same level as the flagship Z9's, but also adds features such as Auto Capture, which enables the ability to use the camera as a 'camera trap' to automatically capture subjects when they move into a predesignated area.  It also adds the high resolution imaging mode found in the Zf that can give you images with as much as 180mp resolution.  Additionally, other features have been added such as the ability to scroll through the different autofocus area modes just by pressing a button.  No menu, no press and rotate a dial.  Also from the Zf camera, Nikon added Flat Monochrome and Deep Tone Monochrome as well as Rich Tone Portrait picture styles.  I loved the monochrome from the Zf.  Another feature that I personally will find useful is the ability to change the border width of the lines of the AF boxes.  I know that sometimes I have a problem locating it somewhere in my EVF when a subject is very busy or is very bright.  There are many others as well—more than a dozen more.  All these additions effectively take the Z8 beyond the level of the Z9 as it now has features the Z9 doesn't.  I'm impressed Nikon!  Thank you!  Nikon has taken the Z8 from an excellent camera now to an incredible camera.  For free!  (Why didn't OM do the same thing with the OM-1?  Instead they make you buy a new camera to get fixes, improvements and features that should have been included in the original camera.  But that is another post...)

Now, why would I make all these changes when I had four really excellent cameras?  There are a few other reasons for the changes other than I stated above.  First, as you've already read, I've not been satisfied with the subject detection AF in my current cameras so I thought, as in the past, that instead of returning from a trip and being a bit disappointed with the results, I would take the leap and buy a camera that has the technology that allows me to nail the focus on those birds-in-flight, stationary birds as well as wildlife, etc.  

Second, the X-H2S and my OM-1 have 26mp and 20mp respectively.  Although I think the number of pixels are adequate for general photography I find, oftentimes, that birds are farther away than I would like and I find I have to crop in more than I'm comfortable doing to arrive at my final composition—even using an 800mm equivalent lens.  Generally speaking, 24mp should be enough for any of us.  But with the fine detail in birds feathers (which I derive pleasure from seeing), those details can be lost by lack of resolving power of the sensor itself at long distances.  I now think a camera for birds and wildlife needs more than 20 or 26mp.  I thought that 20-26mp would be enough but I now think I’m wrong in some circumstances.  

My X-T5 has 40mp but by nature of the controls, lacks an easy way to save most camera settings.  It doesn't work very well for these kinds of subjects when you need to change many settings very quickly—like switching from photographing stationary birds to birds-in-flight.  I started looking for something that had 40mp+ and the ability to save almost all settings to custom banks.  That allows a single button push or dial change to enable changes of many settings simultaneously.  The Z8 will fill these two requirements nicely.

Third, being a Nikon shooter since 1974 and loving my D850 before I moved to mirrorless, the Z8, in my mind, is the reincarnation of the D850.  That camera brought me a lot of pleasure over the years and I miss shooting with it.  The D850 was always a pleasure to use.  Using Nikon cameras is like being with a lifelong friend.  I’m just very comfortable with them.  I’ve owned at least one Nikon continuously since, as I mentioned, 1974.

Fourth, for the past five years my wife and I have been the primary caretakers of her 99-year old mother.  We have been almost completely saddled with staying home and not traveling.  I've been able to make a few very short photo trips, but we've not been able to take any cross country road trips since 2019.  So, we aren't spending any money on travel, vacations, etc.  The result is that funds I have set aside for discretionary spending are adequate to fund the purchase.  I don't have to skip meals or medication!

Finally, in order to offset the cost as well as keep gear to a minimum, I sold my Nikon Z7II, Fujifilm X-H2S and Fujifilm 150-600mm lens as I no longer will need them.  The Z8 nicely takes the place of both cameras—a high resolution 45.7mp sensor of the Z7II and the extreme speed of the X-H2S.  To complete the revamp of my kit, I have a Nikon 180-600mm lens on (back) order.  Who knows when it will ship as this lens is very well regarded and is sold out everywhere.  If anyone knows of a small, local dealer who has one for sale that is not artificially marked up above MSRP, let me know in a comment.  Thank you in advance.

But there are some downsides that I feel obligated to mention.  The Nikon combination is larger and heavier than my Fujifilm or OM kits as well as a bit more expensive.  So I don’t plan on doing any future long distance traveling by air with the pair.  The OM system, which I am keeping will fit the travel bill nicely.  That kit can also work for birds and wildlife, albeit at a lower performance rate than the Nikon kit.  Also, if you are wondering, no I won't be selling my Fujifilm X-T5.  That still remains my favorite camera.  I still have all my other Fujifilm gear.

Your thoughts?  Am I foolish?  (I probably should not ask that question!)  Am I expecting too much from the Fujifilm and OM gear?  Are my standards too high?  Is my logic sound?  Will I regret selling off the X-H2S and 150-600mm lens?  Time will tell.

I'll let you know when the 180-600mm lens finally arrives.  I'm looking forward to using it.

Join me over at my website, https://www.dennismook.com
 

Thanks for looking. Enjoy!  

Dennis A. Mook  

All content on this blog is © 2013-2024 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.

12 comments:

  1. Why not go for it. If I could support two systems I would. Primarily shoot bird photography using OM-1 and recently added 300 F4. Big step up IMO over the Oly 100-400 which I still own for now. The Z8 sounds like a great camera but the weight and larger lens. For me just don’t want to go down that road again as I travel often for birding trips. My thought is always “shoot what you like, like what you shoot”. The Z8 will be a great addition to your camera gear, enjoy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment and encouragement. I’ve been on a mission to go smaller, lighter and less bulky with my gear for years. However, I’m willing to go against that philosophy in this case. I plan on still using my X-T5 as my primary camera as well as my OM-1 for most travel. I look forward to eventually getting the long lens then getting out with the birds to see how it works out.

      Delete
  2. Your logic and thought process usually strikes me as sound. and it's your life and money. I have loved shooting Olympus digitally for years, beginning with the C-8080, and currently with EM1 mark III and f2.8 lenses. But I always wondered whether the types of shots I like to take could be improved with a larger sensor. So I also took advantage of a Nikon refurb sale and bought the Z6 II, and so far just the 24-70 f4 lens, and am so happy with the image quality.

    I suspect you'll find that it takes the right tool for this kind of work, at least to do it to your satisfaction and standards. - Jim

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comment Jim. I decided to buy the Z8 not so much for the size of the sensor but for the superior subject recognition AF abilities. If I hadn’t started to do much more bird and wildlife photography, I wouldn’t have considered another full frame camera as I’m very happy with the image quality of my m4/3 and Fujifilm gear. No complaints from me. It’s just that the OM-1’s (and X-H2S’s) ability to accurately and consistently focus while utilizing subject recognition (specifically birds) is not where I would like it to be. As for the Z6II, in my recent Zf use and test drive, which uses the same sensor, produced image quality as good as any camera I’ve ever owned. I’m glad you found that camera and love the quality of your images from it. ~Dennis

      Delete
  3. Makes good sense to me. I've been a Fuji shooter for years and currently shoot an X-T3 with the 100-400 as my long lens. I have no problem getting tack sharp images of stationary birds at 1/125 and higher with that combo. If you can't get tack sharp images of stationery birds with the X-H2S at 1/1600th, then I'm glad I haven't upgraded. Your report of inconsistent autofocus on the X-H2S is a common complaint on the internet. I've been eyeing the Z8 for months now and was excited about this latest firmware update with one exception. Nikon's pre-release is still JPEG only. Very disappointing. Look forward to your report on the Z8!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Doug, thanks for your comment. Two years ago I wrote extensively, five or six posts or more, about the AF inconsistency issues with Fujifilm cameras. I think I’ve received more comments about that topic than any other and from what people are still submitting to this blog, the issue still exists. That said, I want to make two points about my experience with my X-H2S and X-T5. Neither of my copies of those cameras, after extensive and multiple tests have an issue with general inaccurate or inconsistent autofocus. Both are (were) accurate. Where my issue lies with both the X-H2S using both the 100-400 as well as the 150-600mm lenses is with AF consistency using the bird subject detect mode. The same issue exists with my OM-1 and the Olympus 100-400mm lens. For example, with a stationary bird, large or small, using my best braced technique, shutter set at 1/1600th or 1/2500 second, bird detect on, AF-C with a small zone and the camera set for 10fps, I would gently press the shutter for, say, a ten-shot burst. The AF shows the target acquired and AF locked onto the bird’s eye or head, depending upon distance and size of the bird. Holding the shutter down for a 10-frame burst, frame one would not be in sharp focus, frame two and three would be sharply focused, frame four, five and six would be slightly out of focus, then frame eight and nine would be sharply focused followed by frame ten being, again, slightly out of focus. Other times, all ten shots would be in sharp focus. There seems to be no rhyme nor reason for it failing to hold sharp focus for all the exposures in a single burst. When bird detect is not engaged, the camera focuses just fine. Tack sharp. Both the X-H2S and OM-1 exhibit the same behavior. The other thing is that the focus box would randomly jump off the bird and onto the background or something else, then move back onto the bird. Several times. Totally randomly when nothing else in the frame even looks like a bird or any other animal. Go figure?

      I have come to the conclusion that the subject detect is not engineered well enough to lock on focus continuously all the time. That is why I’m moving my bird and wildlife photography to a Z8. And…this behavior with those cameras has happened time and time again on several outings over several months. I’m just tired of being frustrated. Life is too short. When I get the 180-600mm Nikon lens and have the opportunity to really exercise it on birds and such, I will write about it. ~Dennis

      Delete
  4. Dennis, I always enjoy your articles. This one is as excellent as ever. It’s your money, and you get to buy whatever you desire! I’ve always enjoyed and shared your general philosophy about keeping the gear small when possible. I’ve shot for decades as a professional with Canon and Nikon and am very familiar with Sony, also. Because I’m accustomed to shooting with heavier gear, I’m happy that I currently shoot primarily with Olympus and OM System gear for pretty much everything—portraits, travel, nature, and birding. I must admit that although I have an OM-1, I’m currently considering buying the OM-1 Mark II because who knows if OMDS will bring most of this cameras new features to the original OM-1. The OM-1 II seems to hit most of the marks you were looking for as far as subject recognition and improved accuracy. Although it still retains the same 20mp sensor, I’m surprised you didn’t purchase that one over a Z8, or at least add it to the kit since you only need the body. It will be interesting to see where this next chapter of your journey takes you. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment. I appreciate you taking time to share your thoughts. Also, thank you for your kind words. I still prefer going smaller, lighter, less bulky and certainly less costly while maintaining excellent image quality. That’s why I won’t be divesting myself of my m4/3 gear. It still performs excellently in (almost) all circumstances. When the OM-1 II was introduced, of course, I was very interested. I watched two live hour+ long presentations by OM technical representatives (from the UK & US) as well as watched quite a few recorded video presentations by those who had early access to the camera. In fact, I was able to ask questions during one of the live presentations. I wanted to know as much about this camera as possible. During one of the live presentations, OM officially said there are NO plans for any firmware updates for the OM-1. That surprised and disappointed me. In some ways, angered me a bit as there are things in the OM-1 that have not been quite right from the beginning. They should easily be fixed in firmware. My other thoughts are that, so far, everything we are seeing, hearing and reading are from those who have had early access to the camera, not people like you and me who have no connection to OM. I’m waiting for the general public to start reviewing this camera and then form my opinion as to how much features have been improved. What I’ve seen so far has been full of hyperbole. The camera does interest me and if, in the future, I consider purchasing a backup camera for my current OM camera, I will seriously consider purchasing one. Right now, I have three systems with no backup camera for any of them. I’m not sure yet which system will be the one in which I buy a backup camera. (I had the Fujifilm X-H2S along with my X-T5 but sold it as I never really warmed up to it.) As for why I didn’t consider the OM-1 II instead of the Z8, that is because the Z8 sale was weeks before the OM-1 II was announced. If I would have known it was imminent, I may have held off until we have good information about it then decide whether or not to buy the Nikon at the next sale or go with the Mark II. ~Dennis

      Delete
  5. I see the camera change as an example of the continuing evolution of camera technology. The camera stork may be headed for my house. Kudos to Nikon for the firmware upgrade rather than to introduce a Z8 II so soon. As to the OM focus variance within a sequence, it seems to me the AF is either too sensitive, or not sensitive enough, to stay in sync with the frame rate so it may be hunting for focus in microseconds. Or possibly the silent shutter setting is a factor. I will try different shutter settings with the OM. Using the mechanical shutter with the Z7 seems to improve the hit rate.
    The Nikkor 180-600 seems to be a good compromise between price and performance. While those are in short supply, I can personally recommend the Tamron Z 150-500 which I recently rented. The central area at 500mm wide open is superb. The lens has weight, but in travel mode is really no longer than the Nikon 70-300 on FTZ. So much better than the size and weight of the Nikon 200-500 or the Tamron or Sigma 150-600's.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for commenting. I appreciate it. I’ve tried different amounts of “stickiness,” so to speak in the OM’s menu settings. It goes from -2 to +2. I don’t see much of a difference. I’ve also used both the mechanical and electronic shutter over the past several outings. Again, haven’t noticed much of a difference. I’m very interested in how much actual, “real world” improvement there is in the new model.

      I have a road trip planned for late May to Yellowstone and the Tetons to photograph momma grizzly bears and their cubs, moose, elk, bison, wolves, etc. I will be driving out from SE Virginia. Because I’m driving solo and the trip is about photography, instead of taking my smaller m4/3 gear, I plan on taking the Nikon gear. There will be plenty of room for it. Choosing the Nikon 180-600mm lens with its longer reach and its ability to accept the 1.4X tele-converter with little or no image degradation is the primary reason I’ve chosen that lens. If it doesn’t arrive in my hands before it’s time to leave, the Tamron 100-500mm lens is of primary consideration to buy instead. Also, I would consider the Sigma 60-600mm lens with the FTZII adapter as everything I’ve read about that lens is that it is huge, heavy (unfortunately) but produces very sharp images. I’m not sure, however, how well the AF works. I have to further explore that. It might even be more advantageous to buy the Sony E Mount model and use a Sony E to Nikon Z adapter. I understand the Sony E mount version of the lens is a newer version than the older Nikon F Mount version. We’ll see. ~Dennis

      Delete
  6. Dennis, I had exactly the same experience, a few years ago, on a one-in-a-lifetime photo safari in Kenia. Brought 2 X-H1´s and 1 X-T3 with 100-400, 50-140, 16-55 and both TC´s. We had incredible sightings and I took a lot of pictures. Sadly enough too many of my pictures missed the exact focus. After returning back to Germany where I live, I switched again back to NIKON. I´ve been a NIKON user, off and on, for almost half a century. Tried F-mount with D 500 for animals and birds. Together with TC 14 III. Was not satisfied. Then came Z6 and Z7 II. First tried 100-400 and 70-200 + TC´s 1.4 and 2.0. Much better and, when focus was found, always spot on. Changed to Z8 10 months ago and got a 500 PF 5.6. Now we are talking sharpness!
    Success rate almost 100%. Haven´t had time to test FW 2.0, but I have no doubt that things will improve even more. Aquired a Zf along the road. A gem especially with the 26mm 2.8. This combination has put my Leica Q-P to shame. Greetings from Germany!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great story! Thanks for sharing it. I’m looking forward to better results from the Z8 than I realized from the X-H2S and OM-1. I just have to practice patience waiting for the lens. I’ve not been to Germany, but I have a lot of admiration for your country, especially the many technical accomplishments and the automobile industry. I hope to get there one day. ~Dennis

      Delete