As novice photographers, in our search to improve our skills, many of us were taught best practices. More experienced photographers, photographic writers and teachers would pass to us those things that would help us get better and optimize our photographs. Typically, topics such as gesture, moment, compositional rules (guidelines?), hyperfocal distance, the exposure triangle, shutter speeds for either stopping motion or purposely blurring it, depth of field, steady handholding techniques, etc. were presented to us along with examples. We followed those experts in hopes that we could make better photographs.
When it came to use of your lenses, it was not unusual to be told to not shoot wide open as your lens was not at its sharpest at that aperture. They told us that at apertures typically two stops down from wide open was usually the sharpest aperture on a lens. (That rule doesn't apply nearly as much now as it did in the past as lens technology has greatly improved) Also, we shouldn't stop our lenses all the way down to, say f/22 or f/32, as the physics and the bending of light through such a small hole will soften the image, reduce the resolution of fine detail and affect the overall sharpness of our images. Well, times have changed. It may be time to throw those last two recommendations out.
With today's digital photographic technology, in the form of image processing programs, slight image softness found when using a lens at its widest aperture or at its smallest, can now be largely negated. I've written about this before, here and here, and have continued my experiments in improving sharpness using plug-ins. Specifically, I've been using Topaz Labs Sharpen AI for some time on many, many images and I've found that I can reliably shoot wide open when needed as well as stop down to minimum aperture when extreme depth of field is needed and then counteract the overall softness or edge softness using this software.
To demonstrate this, I found a subject that had detail in the center, edges and corners. I set my Fujfilm X-T4 with the 16-55mm f/2.8 lens mounted on a sturdy tripod, squared it up to my subject, set the ISO on 160 (native), recording in RAW, the 2-second time then made three sets of images at each aperture from f/2.8-f/22, first focusing in the center, then the edge, and finally the corner.
The resulting images would be as you would expect. At f/2.8 the lens was just a tad less sharp than at smaller apertures. The images made with f/5.6 and f/8 were the sharpest across the field and f/22 had lost many of the fine details that could be seen at wider apertures. Then I sent the images through Topaz Sharpen AI and that program basically equalized if not bettered the sharpness and appearance of fine detail in the images.
I've included some examples of 100% crops of images made at f/2.8 and f/22 before and after being sent through Sharpen AI. I don't know if you will see what I see as I'm sure Google compresses the image files when I send them and they are posted. But to me, the results are clear. However, I'm only showing you the results from a specific camera and lens combination. Your camera and lens combinations may differ so I encourage you to make your own tests, download a free trial of the software and see how it affects your specific image files.
First, let's look at comparisons of the 'control' image shot at f/5.6 and the first test image shot at f/2.8. In all of these comparisons I only used the 'recommended' settings in Sharpen AI. I could have increased or decreased the amount of sharpening on any of the images to enhance the effect if needed.
Let's now look at any differences Topaz Sharpen AI can make when using a lens' smallest aperture, f/22, which induces softening due to diffraction.
Since its inception a couple of years ago, I've now tried this plug-in with numerous images and I've found a lot of good things and a few not so good things. First of all, when it works, it works wonders on images that are soft due to just missing focus, suffer softness due to a little camera shake, are stopped down all the way or shot wide open. Second, however, it won't help all images. Which? To find out which, you just have to send an image to Sharpen AI and look at the previews to see how the program affects a specific image. Most of the time I just use the suggested "automatic" settings but, at other times, I manually adjust the settings to optimize a specific image. When the software first came available, I saw a lot of artifacts introduced but since Topaz has updated their AI engine a couple of times, the software has gotten a lot better and I very seldom see any artifacts.
If you are thinking about trying Sharpen AI, I have a couple of suggestions. I normally use it as a plug-in to Lightroom Classic. If you send your image to Sharpen AI, Lightroom will create a TIFF file and send that over to Sharpen AI. However, there may be advantages to working directly on a RAW file and you can easily do that by opening Sharpen AI as an independent program and opening your RAW file directly. If you like to work in Photoshop, you can send your file to Sharpen AI from a layer (or Smart Object), then when returning it to Photoshop, you can then reduce opacity if the effect seems a bit too strong, mask out some areas if you choose, etc. Sharpen AI has a mask tool which allows you to 'paint in' the sharpening selectively or selectively 'erase' sharpening (in designated areas) that has been applied to an entire image. But if you prefer to use Photoshop's masking features, you can mask out out of focus backgrounds, etc. instead of applying sharpening to them.
I find Sharpen AI a wonderful tool to add to my photographic toolbox. With that program, Topaz DeNoise AI and Gigapixel AI, I find little if any differences at all in my smaller sensor image files as compared to my 45mp Nikon Z7 files. As I've said many times, technology will, is, and has become the great equalizer in digital photography.
I now feel free to use any aperture on any of my lenses knowing that any slight degradation of image quality can pretty much be neutralized in one of these auxiliary software tools. Just think. These plug-ins are really good now. Think about how they will improve in the future!
DISCLAIMER: I have no affiliation with Topaz Labs or any other company. I have no advertisements, click through sites, get no commissions nor free software or gear to test. I pay for my software, hardware and gear and pay the same prices as do you. I just try to pass on my knowledge to help you become a better photographer.
Thanks for looking. Enjoy!
Dennis A. Mook
All content on this blog is © 2013-2021 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.
No comments:
Post a Comment