I found this little white clapboard country church, with its graveyard, and thought it was a nice subject for a bit of photography as well as experimentation. The sun was shining directly on the front of the church and the shadows were very deep. With this subject, could a JPEG, even one purposely set for high contrast, be a decent substitute for a RAW image in this case?
Wanting to create something dramatic as opposed to my normal style for realistic renditions in my images, I set the film simulation on the Q-menu to Classic Chrome, with +2 for the highlights and +2 for the shadows. I also set color to +2 but set the sharpening to -2. I think Lightroom shows fewer edge artifacts than using the camera's sharpening algorithm so I planned to do the final sharpening in editing.
The result is what you see above. Just for reference and to see if a JPEG, taken under these extreme circumstances, would hold detail in the highlights and shadows, below is the same image edited as I normally would edit one of my images. This tells me that even with Fujifilm JPEGs and high contrast, there is ample room to recover highlights and shadows if one wanted to primarily use the film simulations instead of RAW.
![]() |
(click to enlarge) |
I also saw this little scene in the corner of a marina. I thought the color combination (all the primary colors) and juxtapositions of the objects was interesting to me. The subject itself is mundane and really unremarkable, however. Again, an experiment with color, contrast and quality.
![]() |
Fujfilm X-T2, 16-55mm f/2.8 lens @ 33.2mm; 1/1600th sec. @ f/5.6; ISO 200 JPEG; Classic Chrome; Shadows +2; Highlights +2; Color +2; Sharpness -2 (click to enlarge) |
Thanks for looking. Enjoy!
Dennis A. Mook
All content on this blog is © 2013-2017 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.
I must admit that I prefer images with deeper shadows. Also, that Coke machine image tells (or at least implies) an interesting story. By that I mean, it poses questions to which the human mind tries to find possible answers. I imagine you would have seen a lot of crime scene photos over the years. Each of those leads to a lot of questions that detectives use to start their investigations (I assume). The vending machine photo also does that, but on a less dramatic scale. In my opinion, that is what makes many photos interesting... apart from just the beauty of some shots.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. Not only have I seen a lot of crime scene photos, I was a forensic detective for many years and worked over 100 death investigations as well as hundreds and hundreds of vehicular accidents, rapes, robberies, burglaries, etc. I have made a lot of crime scene photos. The idea of crime scene photos is to provide visual answers to questions that may arise. Wonderful and extremely interesting time in my life! I would do that part all over again.
Delete