![]() |
Southeast Harbor, Maine (click to enlarge) One of the "lost" images, reproduced from the JPEG X-T2, 16-55mm f/2.8 lens @ 33.2mm; 1/750th sec. @ f/8; ISO 200 |
As I was editing my images from a recent New England road trip, I was looking for some images I made in a specific location of some specific subjects. I couldn't find them—anywhere—in my Lightroom catalog, on my laptop, on my 2 backup hard drives and certainly not on my memory cards since the images I was looking for were taken a couple of weeks and several hundred photos ago. He is my story with some background.
On my recent 15 day road trip I practiced my usual image management system. My established system consists of setting my camera for RAW + JPEG and using two memory cards in the camera with the second card serving as a backup. At the end of each day, I import my images into my travel catalog in LIghtroom CC in my laptop, then back up the day's images to two USB 3.0 bus powered 1TB hard drives. I then keep one backup hard drive with the computer in a backpack and the other hard drive elsewhere so all copies of my images are not in the same place. Only then, when I have three copies of my images saved in two different physical locations do I reformat my memory cards. Sounds pretty comprehensive. I found a flaw. Let me explain.
![]() |
Southeast Harbor, Maine (click to enlarge) X-T2, 16-55mm f/2.8 lens @ 55mm; 1/600th sec. @ f/11; ISO 200 Cropped final image from the "lost" JPEG |
Here is the flaw. If I shoot photos in several locations in one day, I will make multiple imports. Why? Because I extensively keyword all of my images for stock purposes. Part of the keywording is location as clients want to search by location when searching keywords for certain types of images they may want to license. For example, if I make images in Acadia National Park (continuing with the Maine example), Bass Harbor, Bar Harbor and Southwest Harbor all in one day, I will make four different imports, each by their location. As I import the photos from each location, I keyword them. It is easier for me to keyword all images from a specific location all together rather than go back and individually keyword images later. However.....
![]() |
Typical scene in a small Maine Harbor (click to enlarge) X-T2, 16-55mm f/2.8 lens @ 26.6mm; 1/800th sec. @ f/9; ISO 200 Another of the "missing" images I was able to recover |
Here is what I have decided to do in the future. I now will initially copy all of my images from the camera's memory card to a folder on my computer, then after all images are successfully copied to my computer will I import them by location into Lightroom from that folder. This insures that all of my images are now copied onto my computer (either laptop or desktop) and I will leave them there until a future time, after the editing process so that I know that I've imported every one of them. That should negate the issue of feeblemindedness that I sometimes practice at my advancing age. Hopefully! LOL
![]() |
Tools of the Lobster Trade (click to enlarge) X-T2, 16-55mm f/2.8 lens; Cropped from "lost" JPEG |
I realize that when one reformats a memory card, the reformatting doesn't erase the contents, just the "table of contents" so it appears the card is empty and the space can be over written with new content. I was counting on that methodology to see if my images could be recovered. But I also knew I made many, many images and the area where the lost images resided on the card could have been one of those areas which had been overwritten. The card in question is a Lexar 2000X 64gb UHS II SDXC card, which works very well in my X-T1 and X-T2.
What image recovery program did I use? I used a copy of Lexar's Image Rescue 5, which a free copy was included for download with the last Lexar card I had purchased. I am impressed, to say the least. In fact, the software recovered 1745 images! Hard to believe but I'm convinced this software (Lexar) and this card (Lexar) work very well together.
Lesson learned: Not only does one have to have a comprehensive plan to manage one's images, but it is also important to look for flaws and unintended consequences in one's plan, then ensure you check and double check your procedure before moving on.
In this particular story, there is a happy ending! Thank you Lexar!
Thanks for looking. Enjoy!
Dennis A. Mook
All content on this blog is © 2013-2016 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.
Dennis,
ReplyDeleteThanks for this. I agree with your approach. I have a special import folder in Lightroom labelled 0-Media Intake. It is always at the top of the list of subfolders, and the picture count tells me which pictures have not been processed. I believe by selecting a group of images, you can keyword them in one step. My folder labelling is based on my bias against many nested folders. So I include the date and location in each folder: 2016_10_01_Lake_Tahoe for example. The dated based system sorts the folders automatically by date in the folder directory. Keywords let me find them by location - until Fuji adds GPS. So far, the system has worked pretty well. Best Wishes. Looking forward to seeing more of your road trip images.