![]() |
Nikon D810 with the Nikon 70-200mm f/4 VR lens @ 200mm; 1/800th @ f/8; ISO 200; VR turned off (click to enlarge) |
So, I drove to a nearby river, got out and made a couple of images with a lot of detail on the other side of the river with both cameras and lenses. I shot the Nikon at at f/8 and the Olympus at F/4 to simulate equal depth of field. I also equalized the ISO at 200, since that is the lowest standard ISO that is available on the Olympus (the D810 can use ISO 64).
![]() |
Here is the full Olympus Image (click to enlarge) Olympus E-M1 with the Olympus 40-150mm f/2.8 @ 150mm; 1/1600th sec. @ f/4; ISO 200; IS turned off |
![]() |
Nikon Image cropped to same field of view as Olympus image (click to enlarge) |
![]() |
Nikon image at 100% (click to enlarge) |
![]() |
Olympus image at 100% (click to enlarge) |
So, what does all this mean? You decide. I just did it out of my own curiosity. I will say, however, that today's digital cameras are amazing picture taking machines!
Thanks for looking. Enjoy!
Dennis A. Mook
All content on this blog is © 2013-2015 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.
I love these kind of tests!! Yes, these cameras are all simply so sufficient at this point. I wonder if there is a particular print size after which one of these will be better. My guess is it is a very large print, so would be expensive. I supposed one could crop further and print a piece of the image on a couple of 8x10s.
ReplyDeletePlease repeat this test at dusk with ISO1600. If there still is no difference I'm sold on M43.
ReplyDelete