We all carry cameras for a reason—to make photographs. But what kinds of photographs? Everyone is different but almost universally we want to make excellent ones? Ones that others compliment us on. Carrying a camera should invite curiosity rather than constrain it. Instead of asking whether something is “worth” photographing, ask yourself why you noticed it in the first place. That’s enough. Your eye caught it for a reason. Something made you notice. Ask yourself why? Not every photo you make has to be exceptional. Interesting can be enough.
If you’ve followed this blog for a while you must have noticed that I like to photograph the ordinary. Things as they are everyday. Things that have caught my eye and made me stop and make an exposure or two. Things that others don’t see and pass by. You’ve seen many ordinary subjects posted here. I believe the ordinary can be interesting, not necessarily boring and deserving of ignoring. Should we only look for and photograph the exceptional? I vote no.
![]() |
| Many would just pass this by. (click to enlarge) |
Another thing I see are a lot of ‘portraits’ of animals, birds, buildings, old cars, signs and the like. The images are fine. Many are excellent. But portraits can lack something important and I think a lot of us miss it. What is missing? Context. You may have an interesting subject but no context.
![]() |
| This old church in the South Dakota prairie could have been photographed up close. But I felt the context of its isolation was more meaningful than its portrait. (click to enlarge) |
Context can be and usually is important. When you find something interesting, it’s tempting to isolate it—to make a portrait of just that thing. Sometimes that is the way it should be captured. But often, the surroundings matter. A old weathered sign might be interesting on its own but it’s the abandoned architecturally detailed building behind it or the parking lot with the old truck beside it or the utility poles with dozens and dozens of wires above it that tells you why it caught your eye. When you look at the photograph years later, that context brings back the memory of what you actually saw. What you experienced. What you felt when you were there. It also gives the viewer who wasn’t there alongside of you and didn’t share the experience a better idea of why you stopped to photograph it.
One of the things I like most about photography is that we all see things differently and produce different photographs. An infinite variety. I find it fascinating to view photographs made by someone who sees the world entirely differently than do I. What catches my eye may not catch yours. What seems worth photographing to me might pass you by entirely and that’s exactly as it should be. Making photographs is a very personal thing because seeing is personal. There doesn’t have to be a reason your subject is worth photographing other than the fact that you saw it and it interested you. Seeing it made you curious enough to stop. (Click to enlarge)
Just don’t consider the ‘ordinary’ unworthy of your eye, your photographic efforts and your vision. Don’t just photograph the best subjects in the best light. I think you’ll be missing a lot.
The next time something catches your eye—keep your camera ready. Embrace the ordinary.



Excellent and inspiring post. This post, and the 911 related post, were about vastly different topics but both thought provoking and beneficial. Keep up the good thoughts.
ReplyDeleteThank you very much. I appreciate the kind words. ~Dennis
Delete