![]() |
| This is what my Fujifilm X100VI kit had become––bloated and less pleasurable to use. (click to enlarge) |
In the past, I've expressed my thoughts about the X100VI, how I use it, my different and more casual attitude when using it and how pleased I have been to own and use this camera. You can read about that here, here and here.
One of the main reasons I really enjoy the X100VI (as well as the little Ricoh GRIIIx) is that it has a fixed lens and therefore much of the the decision paralysis of having to decide which lenses to take when going out to photograph as well as changing lenses, disappears. This makes photography for me simpler and with fewer points of friction.
That said, I think I had spoiled my own experience. I lost the 'spirit' of the camera. At some point last year, I bought the two Fujifilm screw-on conversion lenses for this camera with the idea of increasing the camera’s abilities to capture more. The wide-angle conversion lens turns the camera's 35mm (full frame field of view) lens into a 28mm lens. The telephoto conversion lens turns the 35mm lens into an equivalent of a 50mm field of view lens. They are both very well made and sharp. Also, adding them to the front of the camera's lens doesn't seem to affect focus speed or accuracy. All was good.
I most likely would have purchased the Viltrox models (which have slightly different focal lengths) instead as they are less expensive and I have seen glowing reviews of them. But my purchase was before Viltrox introduced them. However, I was able to purchase mine on Amazon.com U.S. but from Amazon in Japan. I saved about 30% in doing so but delivery time was a bit longer.
The reason I say my experience using the camera had been degraded is now, with the two additional lenses, I found myself frequently attaching one or the other (mostly the wide-angle one) to the camera when I saw something that didn't fit nicely into the 35mm field of view. The irony is that one of the main attractions of the camera–one lens, one focal length, one point of view–was now defeated. Easy and satisfying had become less so.
Adding and removing one of the conversion lenses is more cumbersome than just changing lenses on a typical interchangeable lens camera. First, I have to use a bigger bag than when carrying just the camera which results in more weight and more bulk. Another defeat for going small, lightweight and less bulky.
Second, to attach one of the conversion lenses, it is not merely pushing a release button, turning a bayonet mount, grabbing another lens and quickly clicking into its locked position on the camera. Because the lens on this camera requires a 'ring' (and filter) to provide some weather resistance, attach filters or hoods, one has to unscrew the lens hood (no bayonet mount) making sure the ring doesn't come off with it, dig into my sling bag, find the lens I want, then screw it on to the front of the fixed lens. Reverse this to remove it and then reattach the screw-on lens hood. Carefully screwing things off and on is what takes a lot more time as you certainly don't want to rush and cross-thread the lens or filter ring
It gets worse. After buying the conversion lenses I added a 49mm polarizing filter to the kit. The native Fujifilm lens and the 28mm conversion lenses both have a 49mm filter thread. Did I leave it at that? No. I then added a 67mm polarizing filter as that is what fits the 50mm conversion lens. Don't forget to add the filter cases. More choices, more weight, more bulk, more 'things' with which to deal.
![]() |
| This is now what I carry. much less friction and more pleasure. (click to enlarge) |
The culmination of all this happened over this past weekend. Saturday morning I had driven to a city about 50 miles from my home with the idea of of doing a photo walk in city's historic district. As I walked around, I found myself screwing, unscrewing, screwing again, then again, unscrewing the conversion lenses to photograph a variety of subjects. On and off, on and off. All morning. That was it. I had had enough. I made the decision right then and there to return to my root philosophy for using this camera. No more carrying all the extras. I had truly become my own worst enemy in this matter. As of that moment I decided I would no longer carry the two extra lenses, filters and accessories and get back to basics--one camera, one lens, one focal length. Simple, easy, more pleasure, less friction.
I think what I did and how my adding more and more to what was originally a very small, simple kit is not uncommon. I think we tend to want to increase the versatility of our gear so we see accessories that we think will make the gear more effective and allow us to expand our creativity. And, it can. In this case, it was the opposite. Carrying the two extra lenses, filters and other 'stuff' reduced my photographic pleasure in a large way. I wasn’t more creative, I was more aggravated.
Now, I'm back to the smaller bag and no extra lenses. Just the camera with a wrist strap, a spare battery, lens cloth, spare memory card and the little USB charging cable for emergencies. And yes, back to a smaller, lighter bag as well. 😊
Oh! If you have been wondering if I fell into the same trap with the GRIIIx as I had with this camera, no I did not. It just slips into my pocket and is ready when I want to make a photo.
Lesson learned: Keep things simple and use gear in the manner in which it is intended. Don't make things unnecessarily complicated.
Join me over at my website, https://www.dennismook.com.
Thanks for looking. Enjoy!
Dennis A. Mook
All content on this blog is © 2013-2026 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.


Not an uncommon problem, as I can hardly lift my camera bag.
ReplyDeleteI understand. I was working my way back to where I didn’t want to be. 👍🏻 ~Dennis
DeleteThis reminds me of why the Fujifilm GFX is becoming more, and more, attractive to me. Might rent one next week. There is a lot of room for cropping to longer focal lengths without the bother of transport or trying to change lenses with my fumbling hands.
ReplyDeleteI have been testing the theory with a Z7 taking advantage of the 27.5" horizontal image size at 300ppi. With either the 1430 or 2470 mounted, I just crop in post to simulate longer FL's. Works well. Should work even better with the GFX large sensor camera.
Actually the Z7 is a good m43 camera when cropped to DX (20mp).
My Ansco 8x10 camera, that I used in the last century, had reducing backs for using 5x7 and 4x5 film. A 210mm (8 1/4") lens was very wide on 8x10, normal FL on 5x7, and a long FL on 4x5. The double and triple convertible lenses of the era really reduced the cost and bother of the lenses. Convertible lenses weren't really sharp enough for 4x5 negatives to be enlarged, but they really did well on 5x7 and 8x10 negatives. A good example is A. Adams' "Moonrise Hernandez" image made with the 23" rear element of a Cooke triple convertible.
Thanks for your thoughts. I have been suppressing a desire to obtain a Leica Q3 (or Q43) as kind of a forever retirement camera. The idea is that with a fixed 28mm lens, I could crop the 60mp tighter when needed. Even better, if Fujifilm brings out a second generation of the GFX100RF with the fixed 35mm lens (28mm full frame field of view) and it has IBIS (the current one does not), I think that camera would serve me even better. Cropping in on the 102mp sensor would allow more flexibility and the camera is less expensive. I didn’t consider the current model because of no IBIS. ~Dennis
DeleteBig change from MFT!
DeleteYes, admittedly so. I’m warming up to the idea of one camera/one lens eventually when I decide to scale back my photography, which is still years away. I still have the desire to get out every day and photograph. That desire has become an integral part of me. . Carrying the X100VI or the Ricoh GRIIIx is spoiling me, I think. ~Dennis
DeleteThe lack of IBIS with the GFX seems a puzzling omission since IBIS is present in the other Fujifilm cameras. In terms of printing, I am getting good results at 250ppi. At 300ppi, detail in a 19" print is reproduced at about the same size I see viewing the image at 33% in PS on my monitor.
ReplyDeleteI print the 46mp files at 600ppi and there is a bit more discernible detail. However, unless one squints or uses a magnifier it is hidden in a print. At 250 ppi, 60mp provides a 38" horizontal print dimension. A GFX would do that at 300ppi. There is a lot of space there for cropping.
The Q 3 is a great looking camera. I am not sure a "Forever retirement camera" is out there for me. Today, I was remembering the Crown Graphic and the set of American made lenses I was once trying to assemble. The 90mm Wollensak Optar and the Kodak Ektars were good. I took the Crown Graphic to Ireland. I should have left it at home. I would choose something a lot more pocketable if I were to go again. A GFX, or a Q, could make street scenes on the order of a Bruegel painting. There might be several good images contained within the large image to be gleaned later in post.
I looked at that Fuji and all its variants since the first one, and the fixed lens just didn't work for me. Thirty-five millimeters is just not my happy place. Plus, early on they were very fiddly, maybe they still are. And I hear the same about the Ricoh GR's, and no viewfinder, no tilt screen, teeny tiny battery, and a very slow buffer. Too 2003 for me.
ReplyDeleteFinally, the Lumix L10. Nice sensor, a very big battery, great AF, and a lens that you can set up like a bag of primes. A very good lens too with a 24-75 range, and I can set it to anywhere in between. Now I really do have a small kit that fits in a waist pouch, and it's 1/5th the cost of a Leica Q. And I can print 40 inches on the short side and it looks just fine.
Mike, thanks for writing. I’ve found many who say they either love the X100 series (and Ricoh) or don’t like either at all. I guess they are polarizing cameras. I’ve looked at several videos and read the specs of the LX10 as I’ve been interested in it. Nice camera in every way. However, I’m not a fan of a power zoom. I’d rather zoom by hand but the ability to set individual focal lengths is a nice way to mitigate that. One thing I do wonder about is why Panasonic chose the 20mp sensor instead of the 25mp sensor in their last two GH camera? In the future let me know how it works for you after a few months of using it. I’m glad you found bliss! Enjoy it. ~Dennis
DeleteThe L10 does have the larger 26mp sensor, but because it crops to achieve the different focal lengths you end up with around 20mp for most focal lengths, and less for a square. I love my Fuji X1006, and enjoy the fixed focal length. But I am sorely tempted by the L10!
DeleteGuy, thanks for that information. That begs the question why isn’t there a frame ratio, say 2:3, that uses almost the full sensor (potentially 25mp) and only reduces the available pixel count when one deviates from that ratio? I’m sure there is a good explanation but I don’t think I’ve ever heard them or others explain why. No doubt the L10 is a nice camera. Everyone seems to really like them. ~Dennis
DeleteI can confirm that it is the same 25 mp sensor as the GH7. The lens does not cover the whole sensor, and only uses 20 mp of it. Much like the LX100's that were 16 mp sensor and 12 mp net, and in the second variant, a 20 mp sensor with 16 mp net. That's why a 16:9 crop still has 20 mp, as does 2:3. Only 1:1 is the same as on an OM-1 yielding 15 mp. The other nice thing, when you shoot raw, while using the wider focal lengths, you actually have more recorded pixels outside the frame that you can access either by shifting the x/y asis in the geometry tool in LR or ACR, or by scaling down.
DeleteThe power zoom isn't my favorite either, but using it in discrete steps, 24, 28, 35, 50, 70, 75, really does make up for it. And the three position switch on the lens can be made to be specific focal lengths. I have mine set up for 24, 35 and 50. Either way, the power zoom is still much faster than switching lenses.
If you'd like to see some files out of it, let me know and I'll send you some links to work I've done with it.
Interesting Mike. Yes, send a couple of links. I would like to see actual photos that have not been ground up by Google’s algorithms on YouTube. Thanks. ~Dennis
Delete