Monday, February 1, 2021

Will You Buy The Latest And Greatest Camera?

An old barn I stumbled upon during my wanderings.
Fujifilm X-T4; 16-55mm f/2.8 lens @ 21mm; 1/250th sec. @ f/5.6; ISO 1250

Last week, Sony introduced a new camera, the A1.  Wow!  What a camera!  The combined specs on this camera are better than any other digital camera of which I'm familiar.  It truly is a force of technology.  Sony, for now, seems to have set a new high bar with this camera.  A new flagship.  A new camera to make us drool with desire!  

Here are some of the specs and features it has:

50mp back side illuminated CMOS sensor
8K video
ISO from 50-102,400
In-Body-Image-Stabilization (5.5 stops)
Dual Bionz XR image processors
11 kinds of Autofocus including eye/face/animal/bird detection
759 Focus Points
9.4mp EVF @ a refresh rate of 240 hz
Shoots 30 frames per second with autofocusing and tracking
5 metering modes
Pixel Shift combining 16 images producing a 199mp image
1/400th sec flash sync with the mechanical shutter
1/32,000th second shutter speed with the electronic shutter
Wireless and Bluetooth connections
Only at a price of...wait for it....$6500 US
...and it goes on and on

What do you think?  Pretty amazing.  You know what?  I'll never buy one.  I'll never even consider one.  Why?  Very simply, I don't need a camera with those specs, I don't anticipate ever needing a camera with those specs and basically, although a whiz-bang fantastically featured camera, it is of no interest to me whatsoever.  I'll bet for the vast majority of you, it is of no interest either.  That's not to say that for a while you won't fawn over the specifications.  I'll go farther and opine that 95-98% or more of the photographers out there will never consider buying it.  Why?

Many of us photographers have reached the so-called tipping point where we are happy with our current camera's image quality and features as well as our user experience.  We are pretty darn happy with the camera or cameras we now own.  This means our camera buying habits have changed.  For many of us, including myself, in the past we would consider buying the newest model camera (of our favorite brand or another brand if it was deemed attractive enough to switch systems) after introduction as we wanted to keep current, have the best technology and most versatility available and, in a way, have some bragging rights.  Again, for many of us, that has changed.  There no longer is a need to have the latest, greatest and best cameras available.  The current and even last few generations of cameras provide excellent image quality, are packed with more features than we would typically use and satisfy us in how it feels in our hands as well as the images we produce.  We no longer need to buy new cameras regularly and, and for some, ever again.  By repeatedly and continually playing this 'one upsmanship' game the photographic industry has created a business model that is slowly putting themselves out of business.   Its not just the smart phones that impact sales, its the industry itself that is its own worst enemy.

The camera companies would do well to talk with as many of us currently satisfied photographers as possible, as we now represent the majority, to better understand exactly what new features, body size, price point, additional lenses and accessories, etc., i.e., what it would take for us to actually purchase a new camera.  

Also, they need to stop listening to the YouTubers, reviewers, critics, bloggers and writers who keep telling them that more is better.  Frankly, it is not!  More is more expensive but it doesn't necessarily get you better images.  The YouTubers and the rest are not the friends of the camera companies.  Fundamentally, they are only looking out for themselves in driving traffic to their sites to maximize the amount of money they can make.  They push for more, more, more.  That costs money in the way of research, development, engineering, manufacture, marketing and distribution.  That push to encourage camera companies to add more pixels, more features, faster focusing, more FPS, more focus points, 8K video, etc. is doing them a disservice.  For what the companies must charge, coupled with the smaller and smaller number of sales, the current philosophy of camera craft is sending them right into bankruptcy.  

I watch a YouTube guy by the name of Matt Irwin.  He is a pro out of Australia.  Primary he shoots Nikons.  I found his current video interesting as he addresses the continued trend in producing very high end cameras with incredible specs, such as the newly released Sony A1.  He tries to make the case that these kinds of cameras are really for ‘bragging rights’ as 95% of photographers, while they may 'oooo' and 'ahhh' over its specs, never will nor ever have the intention to actually buy one.  He ponders how long this sort of thing—camera companies continually to try to outdo each other—can go on.  He wonders if, in the future, some companies will begin to develop the philosophy that they don’t need bragging rights and will concentrate on developing excellent cameras, but not necessarily the greatest, amazingly featured, cutting edge cameras.  They will make cameras that most of us can afford, feel good to use and which give us the features most of us will use and have image quality that no one can legitimately complain about.  Will camera companies make a business decision to let Sony or whomever else have bragging rights while they concentrate more on the ‘useful’ features that most photographs actually need and want?  Interesting take.  I’m probably in agreement with him but I need to think about it for a while.

Often times in the past I have written that you really shouldn't go out and buy a new camera unless it will improve your photography, allow you to experiment with new techniques or provide features that you need for the kinds of photography you do (or want to do).  However, sometimes it is nice, if you can, to just buy something because you 'want' it but do not necessarily need it.  I've done that on more than one occasion.  I'm not sure I'll do that much in the future and it might be those who 'want' rather than 'need' will be the ones who purchase those latest, greatest and best cameras out there—mainly for bragging rights.

Join me over at my website, https://www.dennismook.com
 

Thanks for looking. Enjoy!  

Dennis A. Mook  

All content on this blog is © 2013-2021 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.

8 comments:

  1. I recently added a few camera bodies & lenses to help with some of my photography scenarios & was pleased. While I do enjoy looking at the next generation of models, I tend to buy more of the last generation to get that big discount on the slightly older gear.

    The expansion of camera capabilities continues onward, but features like 100 megapixels seems excessive for what I need. My example: If I need to get from one place to another, a Honda CRV works fine, (and even a bike can do the job in some cases), so I won't be purchasing a Range Rover for the job, despite some upgrades in features.

    Thanks - Chris

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the last few generations of cameras will serve almost all of us almost all of the time. Thanks Chris.

      Delete
  2. The new Fujifilm GFX100s got me a bit excited (I'm an X-T4 user), but I'm resisting the urge to scrape together the money to get one. I rarely print larger than 8x10 and the X-T4 is good enough for that.
    Frankly, I wish Fujifilm would build a camera without video in it. I don't know how much it adds to the cost of a camera, but I never use it. When I saw the Sony has 8K video I immediately wondered how many new hard drives you would need to record a family picnic . . . .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Marcus, I’m with you. Build me a camera without video and without the articulated screen. The X-T3 style LCD is perfect. Thanks,

      Delete
  3. My favorite rental for 2020 was the D850. If I needed one, it would be an immediate purchase because of the feature advantage over the D750. Yet, I was surprised at the noticeble noise in some images. I saw noise that I do not see with my Olympus. For my uses, I would expect more negatives than positives from the Alpha 1.
    I made a big production of photographing the Christmas tree using HDR and post processing. At the end my favorite image of the tree was the snapshot I made with a Pixel phone while deciding on camera position.
    If the Alpha 1 had the same computational processing as the Pixel or iPhone, I might be an early adopter of that camera. I'll keep waiting for a camera manufacturer to make that breakthrough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment. Last evening I was watching the YouTube channel, “Photo Rec TV.” Part of his presentation was more details about the camera’s specs. Fox example, the 30 fps is only available with the electronic shutter when the camera is set for ‘lossy’ compression of the files. Why would anyone want to buy a 50mp camera and then purposefully set it to permanently degrade the quality of their files? If you set the camera for “lossless’ compression, you only get 20 fps. If you use the mechanical shutter, you only get 10fps. My 5 year old Olympus camera does better than that! Sometimes things aren’t as they are presented to us.

      Delete
  4. The good news is the introduction of new cameras creates a market of great lightly used cameras. I just picked up the original Sony A9 with battery grip for a great price. It will serve nicely for grandkids softball and baseball this year.

    ReplyDelete