Recently, one of the readers of my blog emailed me and asked for my input as he was in the process of deciding whether or not he should upgrade his camera from a Fujifilm X-H1 to an X-T4. If you have an X-T3 and are thinking about moving to an X-T4, I'll add some comments that pertain to that move as well.
I thought some of you might get some benefit from my response so I am posting it, with just a little editing and some additional thoughts (in red). This response certainly isn't comprehensive but just my thoughts about some of the differences, benefits, drawbacks of upgrading to a newer model camera. I'm always happy to help others so if you have an issue in which you think I can help, you can find my email on my website (shown below).
Dear XXXX,
I'll be happy to help, if I can. I'm happy to learn you take your photography seriously.
First, I really can't give you a definitive answer as to whether or not it is a wise move to upgrade to the X-T4 as I don't know what types of photography you practice. For some types of photography, the upgrade would be worthwhile and for others, not so much. The two biggest differences I think you would find using an X-T4 are a) an improvement in focus speed, eye and face focus lock-on ability and much better focus tracking The second big difference is the actual shape of the body, in other words, how it feels in your hand when you pick it up and use it. To me, a much better feel than the X-T cameras. But that is just me.
I should add that knowing what kind of photography one practices is the first and fundamental question that needs answered. I would upgrade only if new or improved features in the prospective camera bring value, improvement or allow me to photograph in a way I now cannot with my current gear. Faster focusing for a landscape photographer will make no difference, but it will if you photograph weddings, family or other events, sports, etc.
If you are looking for a visible improvement in image quality, you probably won't see much if any at all. Fujifilm's 24mp sensor in the X-H1 is very similar to the current 26mp sensor and that small number of extra pixels won't make a visible difference. The newer image processor in the X-T4 may make a little difference, probably generating a bit less digital noise, but only at high ISOs. I'm not sure how much of a difference in digital noise there may be, maybe one stop better, but I haven't tested and compared the two cameras for noise profiles. I wouldn't upgrade just for a perceived better image quality as I don't think, under most circumstances, you will see much if any.
With the X-H1 you already have in-body-image- stabilization (IBIS), so you won't gain much there either. (If you have an X-T3, you don't have IBIS so your gain is quite substantial.) I say not much but you will gain some as the newer IBIS mechanism in the X-T4 is better than the original one in the X-H1. When I photographed with my X-T1, 2 and 3 cameras, I had to remind myself that the camera and my most used lens, the 16-55mm f/2.8, did not have any image stabilization. My Olympus cameras had and have industry leading IBIS, so I had to make the mental transition in my handholding technique when using the Fujifilm cameras. Once I regularly remembered that the Fujifilm cameras and lens had no IBIS, I was able to shoot at slower speeds with greater success as I did in the old film days. Having it in the X-T4 is nice but don't let your technique get sloppy thinking IBIS is the be all to end all. So there is some gain there, but just a little. If you do a lot of handheld photography in marginal light, you will find the improved IBIS a bit of benefit.
That said, IBIS (or lens IS) isn't absolutely necessary and many of us photographed without it in cameras of lenses for years and years. One just needs to remember that hand holding a camera at slower shutter speeds takes practice. If you perfect the technique, you can use shutter speeds slower than the old advice of 1/focal length shutter speed and still be successful. Most of the time!
One feature that I appreciate in the X-T4 is the semi-automated focus bracketing. I photograph landscapes and sometimes closeup and macro subjects so the ability to focus on and have the closest point I want in sharp focus, focus on and have the farthest point I want in sharp focus, then have the camera calculate the appropriate number of exposures and the focus differential between each exposure, is a very nice feature. Manually, it takes a bit of trial and error and practice to get it right. So, if you practice this kind of photography, this feature may be worthwhile addition.
You will see a worthwhile improvement in focus speed, focus acquisition, eye and face tracking as well as general continuous autofocus. I think there is a noticeable difference. (No so in the X-T3 as Fujifilm has improved this to X-T4 levels in a recent firmware update.) So, if you regularly photograph people, pets, events, wildlife, birds, etc., I think the upgrade would be worthwhile. If you mainly photograph inanimate subjects, the better focusing ability won't do anything for you. Also, the X-T4 focuses much faster and better in lower light than its predecessors. That is good. One other comment about focus. The 'joystick' makes a huge difference to me. In fact, I won't buy another camera that does not have one. Also, a joystick must be positioned in the correct location so your thumb finds it and rests easily on it. The X-T4's joystick is a good one. Two thumbs up, so to speak!
Another benefit for both X-H1 and X-T3 owners is the new, larger battery in the X-T4. That larger battery helps offset the extra power required to operate the IBIS mechanism. The downside is that Fujifilm doesn’t give you a battery charger when buying a $1700 dollar US camera? Are you kidding me? That’s just being cheap, IMHO. That said, the bigger battery makes a nice difference. When I bought my X-T4 I also bought an extra battery (always do). I did purchase Fujifilm’s dual battery charger as well. The larger capacity battery is a nice improvement.
As far as the X-T4's shape versus the X-H1's shape, I much prefer the X-H1's shape. (This will not apply to upgrading from an X-T3 to an X-T4 as they both have the same basic shape.) The grip and forward position of the shutter button is much more comfortable and more intuitive to me. To hold the X-T line of cameras, you have to rotate your wrist backwards to grip the camera and for your index finger to find the shutter button. I think all other digital interchangeable lens cameras made today have the grip and forward shutter position. Fujifilm made the T-series cameras with analog style dials and controls as well as an old film camera analog shape. They need to abandon the shape, in my opinion. I've read quite a few comments from photographers who just don't like the shape of the X-T cameras so they won't buy one, but some love it as well. The X-H1 is still my favorite Fujifilm camera to hold because of its shape. That said, I didn't really like the X-H1's controls. I much prefer the T-series cameras' controls. The brand new and highly regarded X-S1 has the grip and forward shutter button placement. So, maybe the next T-line camera will have it also.
One downside to the X-T4 for me is the swiveling LCD screen. I don't care anything about video and that swiveling screen is made for video people who want to see themselves. The LCD 3-way tilting screen on the X-T3 is about perfect. You may not care, but many of us do. When trying to use a tripod with an L-bracket, the fully swiveling LCD is a disaster. I wish Fujifilm would return to that for their next iteration of T-line of cameras.
I would recommend that if you either know someone that has an X-T camera or if there is one at a Best Buy store or other store nearby, you pick it up and hold it up to your eye to see how different it is. All that said, I've adapted to it pretty quickly and I'm just used to it now. So, in the end, not a deal breaker for me otherwise I wouldn't have bought any of the T-line of Fujifilm cameras in the first place.
There may be some other things that are different enough to make an upgrade worthwhile. I didn't try to touch everything and every difference between the cameras.
I hope this helps. As for me, I'm anxiously awaiting a potential X-H2 as I think that camera will hit all the sweet spots for me. Since I currently don't have a Fujifilm backup camera for my X-T4, I will most likely buy an X-H2 if and when one is released. Of course, I'm in the process of building a new house. All my time, energy and money seems to be going toward that but time will tell.
If you have other questions or if I wasn't clear about anything, don't hesitate to ask. I'm always willing to help others and share my experience and knowledge.
Stay safe. Stay sane. Stay positive but test negative!
Dennis
Thanks for looking. Enjoy!
Dennis A. Mook
All content on this blog is © 2013-2021 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.
Dennis:
ReplyDeleteThis was a very clear and precise answer - WOW! I am an X-T2 shooter. I decided on the Fuji because I liked the retro style with the dials on top. I also think the menu system is fairly intuitive. It offers relatively good images most of the time. There are some aggravations with post processing (because of the sensor used) which you noted in a previous post.
I am going to be moving up to full frame sometime in the next year or so and I will then be looking outside the Fuji ecosystem. This will be an upgrade for me, but not from the same manufacturer.
As always, I enjoy reading your posts!
Thanks, Jeff. When the time comes, let me know if I can help you in any way
DeleteHi Dennis,
ReplyDeleteI hope you’re well and safe in these strange times!
I wondered if I might offer a different perspective regarding the ergonomics and aesthetics of the X-T line. For me personally, it is exactly this which keeps me with Fujifilm. Is this style over function? In a way, yes! But to my mind this is now a more significant differentiator than it might have been in the past. I firmly believe, in 2021, any of the cameras in this price range and beyond are fully capable of capturing stunning pictures which really are limited only by the photographer’s skills and vision, not that of the equipment. In this context, Fuji are offering a unique selling point with their retro (or at least different) styling and traditional controls. I feel I can take this gear to places other, more modern cameras, would seem out of place. E.g., they are great for city/street/travel photography, where they blend in more, or anywhere you want to dress a bit smarter or more stylish, or conversely, more casual. Also, I do personally like the more traditional controls afforded by shutter speed, aperture and ISO dials, etc., and actually prefer the small/no grip and shutter placement, as it feels similar to my Leica M days. Honestly, if Fuji were to abandon this look and ergonomic and go for a modern style, larger grip, etc., I would look elsewhere as many of the other manufacturers offer superior sensors and AF tech, if appearance and traditional controls are not a factor.
Of course, if I shot more nature, wildlife, or sports, I would probably feel differently and want a bigger grip to handle longer lenses better and fast controls, etc., and to me this is the raison d’etre of the X-H line. In fact, I’m surprised Fuji haven’t updated this yet as it really is a different line of cameras for a different purpose, and not really all about video, as some claim, where the hair-trigger shutter wouldn’t be of much concern. Perhaps they are waiting for the (delayed) Olympic year to release an X-H2. I hope so for those who love the Fuji system but need the different grip, etc.
Have a good new year. Happy shooting!
James
James, thank you for your very thoughtful comment. Two of the grandest aspects of our time is that each of us gets to choose what fits us best for our individual reasons and we have so many excellent choices available.
DeleteI, too, am attracted to the T-series of cameras for their retro dials and controls, but not so much for the body shape. I’m an old film shooter at heart and also being a former M user as well as many SLRs from Nikon and Canon, I now prefer the grip that digital cameras have afforded us. That said, if the T-series cameras shapes bothered me too much, I wouldn’t have bought and continue to use them. A niggle to me. I’d rather use my X-T4 rather than my other two cameras.
I agree that the X-series cameras are relatively small and innocuous when practicing more stealthy forms of photography. People don’t pay much attention, especially if one of the small but excellent primes are attached.
If I may ask you, what is your preferred lens to use with your Fujifilm camera?
Again, thanks for your comment. I think others will be in agreement with you.