![]() |
One of the images from the first day's test. Details below. (click to enlarge) |
- Highly advanced AF algorithm, previously found in the OM-D E-M1X (including movie AF)
- The latest autofocus features such as C-AF Center Priority, Group 25-point, and C-AF + MF added
- AF low light limit -6EV support
- Noise at high ISO sensitivity is improved approx. 1/3 steps compared to Firmware
Version 2.3 - Low ISO Processing (Detail Priority) added for higher resolution
- Support for Olympus Workspace new USB RAW Data Edit
I never upgrade my software, either in my computers, tablets or cameras, when first released. Too many times there have been unknown or unexpected bugs or problems that occurred and either the upgrade has to be reversed or a supplemental release is made to fix the bugs that are in the original upgrade. It happens to almost all software manufacturers including Adobe, Apple, Olympus, Nikon, Fujifilm, Canon, etc. It is not uncommon. After the upgrade has been out a while and I don't see any real issues published anywhere on the Internet, I'll then upgrade. I like to be cautious. To the point, Olympus released a modified upgrade, v3.1 a week or so after v3.0 was released. The latest firmware upgrade is v3.1. Evidently, something needed corrected.
After a couple of weeks, I installed Firmware version 3.1 into my E-M1.2. I was especially interested in a couple of the features, with others not so much. What interests me most is assessing how Olympus may have improved the continuous autofocus and the tracking capability. Also, the "Center Focus Point Start" when using multiple focusing points and Zone Focus will make locking focus exactly where you want it much more reliable.
In the past, I almost never used Zone focusing with multiple focus points as I never knew on which focus point the camera would initially select. If I had 9 points activated, I never knew which of the 9 points the camera would pick to initially find focus. I may want the camera to start in the center, but it may pick the upper left point. I felt helpless in which point the camera chose. Most often, it seems, the camera picked a point I didn't want to initially use. That discouraged me from using multiple focus points. Now with the "C-AF Center Start" and the "C-AF Center Priority" checked (Gear menu/Sub-menu A1), the camera always starts with the center focus point. That makes it easy to place that center point over my subject, half-press the shutter and activate focus. The camera will then track your subject as you desire! A welcomed improvement in my book.
Of course I went out to test the improvements to focusing to find out for myself how it now works and if I see an improvement. In short, I'm impressed in the few tests I did. I will test more in the future.
I wanted a difficult target onto which the camera would have to focus and track. In my opinion, the most difficult but convenient and close by subject on which to quickly lock focus, maintain focus and successfully track focus is the Amtrak train that arrives daily in late morning. The train travels at about 79 miles per hour (127kph) with a very bright headlight that can throw off an autofocusing system. I'd be photographing the train coming almost directly at me. I'm told that subjects coming right at the camera are the hardest types of subjects to track. The idea is to lock onto the front of the locomotive in the distance and track it as it comes roaring toward me until it is adjacent to me. At 79mph, that is about 4 seconds from distance to it passing me!
I went out on three different days. Each day's weather was different. Over the tree days I was from 30 ft. from the track to about 20 ft. In other words, the train was moving more toward me than across my view.
On day 1, the sky was blue and not a cloud was visible (top image). The camera was set on manual, ISO 200, 1/1600th sec. @ f/5.6 and white balance was set for full sun. Focus was set on 5-point zone, AF-C + Tracking. Frame advance was set to continuous low (10fps) with the electronic first shutter. IS was off. The train kind of surprised me as I had just turned my attention away (the train was late and I was checking Live Amtrak Tracking to see where it was) and when I looked up, it was almost on top of me. I turned on the camera and only was able to make 4 exposures before it passed. All 4 exposures were in sharp focus, however. My fault. I should have been paying closer attention! Lol.
![]() |
One of the images from the second day's test. Details are in the narrative. (click to enlarge) |
On day three, the sky was blue with lots of scattered cumulus clouds. The camera was set on manual, ISO 320, 1/2000th sec. @ f/5.6 and white balance was set for full sun. Focus was set for a single point, AF-C + Tracking, which is different from the other two days. Frame advance was set to continuous low with the electronic first shutter. IS was off. As the train quickly approached, I raised the camera to my eye, composed and placed the one focus point over the front of the locomotive where I wanted to start tracking. Also, for this series of images I was closer to the tracks than the previous two days so the locomotive was traveling almost directly at me. I made 37 exposures of which 35 were pin sharp. As with the one the day before, I could only discern they weren't as sharp as they absolutely could be by comparing it to the images made directly before and after them. As the train passed, I made 8 more images of it in the distance and 6 of those were in sharp focus. The next to last was just out of focus and the last was visibly out of focus. I think they were because the target became so small in the frame that the tracking could not keep the rear of the passenger car in focus. But I'm not sure.
![]() |
One of the images from the third day's test. Details are in the narrative. (click to enlarge) |
All in all, in these preliminary tests, I think that a) Olympus has upped the ante and improved the camera's ability to acquire and maintain focus of fast moving subjects and b) provided us with a tool, center-start focus, which allows us to directly place our focusing point exactly where we want it. I have not yet tried this on people. I'm not much of a people photographer and I'll leave that to others. I may try it, however, the next time one of my grandchildren has a birthday. That should be a really tough test.
Hope this content was of value to you E-M1 Mark II users out there. I know there are quite a few of you.
Join me over at Instagram @dennisamook or my website, www.dennismook.com.
Thanks for looking. Enjoy!
Dennis A. Mook
All content on this blog is © 2013-2019 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.
Thanks Dennis. One pro said the v3.0 firmware created numerous issues when shooting video, which thankfully I don't do. Shooting still photos takes up enough time as it is. LOL
ReplyDeleteHave a great weekend.
Thanks, Jim. I have no interest in video either. I wish I could convince Olympus to replace the swing out LCD with the method Fujifilm uses. Perfect for horizontal and vertical still photography.
DeleteI have never seen a Fuji camera in person as there are no longer any real camera stores in my area. But from what I have seen I am intrigued by the LCD screen setup from Fuji. From the Oly cameras I have owned, I prefer the LCD screen of the original EM1 to the articulating style employed in the Mark II versions of the EM1 and EM5.
DeleteJim, what’s nice about the manner in which Fujifilm engineered the movement of the LCD is that no matter if you need to hold the camera high or low, horizontal or vertical, you can flip the screen so it faces you. If you have to hold it high in a horizontal position, the back flips down. If you have to hold the camera low in a horizontal position, the back flips up. If you wish to hold the camera over your head in a vertical position, rotating the camera clockwise while gripping the camera with your right hand (as you normally would), the back still flips down. Same with holding it low in a vertical position but rotating the camera now counter-clockwise. The back flips up. For my work, it is perfectly engineered. I believe Panasonic also adopted this same design with their new full frame cameras. It just works!
Delete