![]() |
Sunset over Assateague Island, Eastern Shore, Virginia (click to enlarge) Fujfilm X-H1; 50-140mm f/2.8 lens @ 94mm; 1/1000th sec. @ f/11; ISO 200 |
![]() |
Fujifilm X-H1 Front View Press Photo (click to enlarge) |
![]() |
Rear; Press Image (click to enlarge) |
The price reduction was unexpected and quite startling. The camera/power grip combination is now priced at $1300 US, a reduction from less than a year ago when it was introduced and sold for $2200 US. That is a $900.00 US savings, which is a game changer when it comes to the value of this camera/power grip combination. I can categorically say that I would not have purchased it a year ago (and didn't) because I thought it was overpriced for any differences or advances it possessed as compared to the X-T2. Now, I think what this camera provides to the photographer makes it a very good value.
![]() |
Top View (click to enlarge) |
As stated by Fujifilm, there seem to be three reasons the X-H1 is slightly larger and heavier than the X-T series cameras. First, the magnesium alloy frame is 25% thicker, which adds some additional weight but also provides extra insurance from damage. Second, Fujifilm says the size of the body had to be increased due to a completely newly designed shutter. The shutter, I think, is quieter than any other camera I've used, even my Leica rangefinders. Sort of on par with a soft click of a leaf shutter you might find on a large or medium format camera. We are told this new shutter is necessary because of the inclusion of the third reason, the IBIS feature. The shutter mechanism "floats" and is designed to have the least vibration and effect on images with slower shutter speeds. Fujifilm says the shutter is necessarily larger and more complex.
![]() |
(click to enlarge) |
If you have not held an X-H1, I've included some photos from the website, Camerasize.com, to show you the differences in size between the X-H1 and X-T3. Also, if you think this camera is large, I've included a couple of comparisons between the X-H1 and the Olympus E-M1 Mark II. I think you will be a bit surprised that the size differences are not that large. For example, the X-H1 is .18 inches taller than the X-T3. Not even 0.2 of an inch (4.5mm). It is also .29 inches (7.3mm) wider. Less than 1/3 of an inch. The biggest difference is from the size of the grip, which is actually a benefit to handling this camera.
As far as most of the buttons and dials are concerned, the camera is very familiar. If you already own an X series camera, you should have no trouble setting up and using this camera. With the exception of a few, all the buttons and dials are in familiar places. What is different is the placement of the shutter button, which I already mentioned, the exposure compensation (EC) dial, which is missing altogether due to the addition of a small LCD on the top plate and the "Q" button is moved to a position under your right thumb. The AF-L button has been replaced and repositioned with an AF-On button, which now sits next to the AE-L button. None of these are of consequence to me with the exception of the exposure compensation function, in my opinion.
![]() |
Stormy morning; Deadrise work boats, Bull Island, Virginia (click to enlarge) X-H1, 16-55mm f/2.8 lens @ 20mm; 1/200th sec. @ f/11; ISO 200 |
With the X-H1 you can set the EC button to function in two different ways. You can change EC upon your push and hold of the button while you rotate the rear command dial or you can set the button to toggle on/off the EC function. I had a very hard time finding and pushing the button with my eye to the viewfinder and quickly became frustrated. I found I had to take the camera from my eye, push the button and rotate the dial, view the top small LCD to see what EC I was dialing in, then put the camera back to my eye. As it functions on this camera, I would much rather have the exposure compensation dial rather than that small LCD on the top of the camera. The dial works wonderfully! I'm not sure why Fujifilm had to go and fiddle with something that was working well.
![]() |
Fishing net and floats (click to enlarge) X-H1; 16-55mm f/2.8 lens @ 55mm; 1/2500th sec. @ f/8; ISO 200 |
I will end Part I here. On Wednesday, I will post more about image quality and operation of the camera as well as post more images, both color and black and white.
Join me over at Instagram @dennisamook or my website, www.dennismook.com.
Thanks for looking. Enjoy!
Dennis A. Mook
All content on this blog is © 2013-2019 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.
Dennis: I bought and returned the X-H1 for the X-T3 because of the improved processor, AF and video. However, I loved the shutter release and handling of the X-H1 with my 100-400, not to mention the IBIS. I hated the Q button placement and the exposure compensation button/dial. It was still a tough decision. The X-T3 is great for sure. In the end, I might end up with an X-H2 if they decide to make one in 2020. Looking forward to learning more about the X-H1. It's quite a buy!
ReplyDeleteDoug, thanks for writing. The two cameras are certaly different and both have their strengths. I guess it comes down to what features are most important for the type of photography one practices. I, too, disliked the exposure compensation button and disliked even more where Fujifilm placed it. So, what I did was map the front function button, which fits neatly under my right middle finder, to activate exposure compensation. That satisfactorily solved the issue for me.
DeleteI will post the remainder of my opinions about this camera in the morning. I’ll be interested if you have any additional comments.
Good for you Jorge. I hope you like it as much as I like mine.
ReplyDelete