The other day I found myself thinking about some of the gear I've had over my photographic lifetime. I'm not sure why I was thinking about all of those cameras, but it struck me that the cameras I really enjoyed using, the ones I kept for long periods of time, are the same cameras that allowed me to produce some of my best and most satisfying images. The ones that I purchased, used for a period, didn't like much for a variety of reasons, then sold, didn't inspire me to make good images.
This is not to say that I didn't make bad images with my favorite cameras or good images with my least favorite cameras, but it was easier to use tools that I felt handled and worked just right for me and the types of photography I practiced. It was a joy picking them up, taking them out and using them. No fiddling or fumbling or struggling to make them work the way I wanted and needed them to work.
For many, many years I could honestly say I had one all-time favorite camera. I can't say that today since there are now four cameras that tie for that title. Previously, my 20 year relationship with my Pentax 6X7 camera was at the top. I lugged around that big heavy Texas-sized 35mm looking camera body and four lenses all over the country and loved the images I made with it. I almost exclusively used negative film as I developed and printed my own black and white prints, up to 16" X 20" (40 X 50 cm)., A close friend owned a professional photo lab and allowed me to develop and print my color enlargements there, which was a real treat. A negative 4 times the size of a 35mm negative gave me the minimum quality i desired.
Since the digital age, I now consider the Pentax, the Nikon D810, the Olympus E-M1 and the Fujifilm X-T1 as tied for my all-time favorite camera bodies. Each of those cameras worked just right for me, allowing me to take my mind off the technical aspect of fiddling with settings, controls and dials and allowing me to concentrate on the creative aspect of my photography.
Here is an update to that list in alphabetical order, not in the order in which I purchased and used them over the past 46 years. Still way too many. Can you say gluttony? Or embarrassment?
As you can see, brand really doesn't matter to me. It is finding the tool that does the job best for me.
Calumet 4X5 Studio Camera
Canon A-1
Canon EOS 650
Canon EOS 620
Canon F-1
Canon F-1n
Canon G11
Canon G2
Canon G9
Canon S95
Contax T
Fujifilm X-T1 (2)
Holga 120N
Kodak Brownie Flashmate 20
Kodak Instamatic 102
Koni Rapid Omega 100
Leica M3 SS
Leica M6
Leica M6 TTL
Leica M7
Leica Minilux
Leica R4SP (2)
Leica R8
Mamiya C330F
Minolta Dimage A-1
Minolta Hi-Matic 7
Minolta SR-T101
Nikkormat EL
Nikon D200
Nikon D300
Nikon D70
Nikon D7000
Nikon D800E
Nikon D810
Nikon F2A
Nikon F2AS
Nikon FE
Nikon FE2
Nikon FM
Nikon FM2n
Nikon N2020
Nikon N8008
Nikon N90
Nikon N90s
Olympus OM-D E-M5
Olympus OM-D E-M1
Olympus XA
Panasonic GX1
Pentax 645 (2)
Pentax 645N
Pentax 6X7 (3)
Plaubel Makina 67
Plaubel Makina 67
Speed Graphic
Tachihara 4X5 Cherry Field Camera
Thanks for looking. Enjoy!
Dennis A. Mook
All content on this blog is © 2013-2016 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.
Dennis--
ReplyDeleteAh, the aesthetics of cameras themselves, not just of the photographs we make with them!
I agree. Tools can have a beauty that makes them even more useful. And with cameras, that usefulness includes the production of beauty. Beauty, as they say, is in the eye of the beholder, and among today's cameras, I find Olympus and Fuji beautiful, in contrast to the lumpish unattractiveness of the big Canons and Nikons. (I don't own any Fuji, but it was between Olympus and Fuji when I went mirrorless in early 2012.)
One note: You don't have Olympus OM-1 or OM-2 in your list, yet back in August 2014 you replied to a comment I made that you had "used an OM-1 and OM-2 extensively in past years." I suppose you may have used them without owning them, but, given their aesthetic appeal, is that likely?
Anyway, thanks as usual for your consistently interesting blog.
Walt
(Walter Foreman, namerof@uky.edu)
Walt, I'm positive there are several I have forgotten. Thanks for the reminder.
Delete