Friday, May 6, 2016

JPEG Versus RAW Versus HDR With The Fujifilm X-T1

Bracketed DNG file created in Lightroom CC (click to enlarge)
Recently, I was out wandering around the countryside of southeastern Virginia looking for interesting things to photograph.  As I passed through a familiar location, I stopped to see what had changed with an old railroad depot I had photographed a number of times earlier.  As expected, it has become more dilapidated and continues to deteriorate.  I believe the current use of the building is that of a makeshift warehouse of some sort for a nearby feed company.

It was bright, sunny spring day with a gorgeous sky and I wanted to make the most of this type of day, since we don't get many with the puffy, white, cumulus clouds nicely spaced on a day with low humidity and bright sunshine.  I stopped to make some record photos of the old depot as it gives me an idea, year to year, at its rate of disintegration.

Since the day was so bright and the shadows were very deep, I thought I would three exposures a stop apart so as later have the ability to combine images and capture the detail of the shadows while retaining the full beauty of the bright white clouds and blue sky.  The dynamic range of the image was quite wide and I wasn't sure the X-Trans II sensor could capture all of it in one exposure.  It turns out, I needn't have done that as when I started editing the images, I was able to fully pull out all of the detail from the shadows as all of the highlight detail from the clouds—amazingly not only from the RAW image but from the JPEG as well!
Single RAF file (click to enlarge)

When I returned home, I started editing my images.  In this particular view of the front of the old station and the nearby tracks and surrounds, I chose three of the images I made 1 stop apart and used Lightroom CC 2015 to merge them into a 32-bit HDR DNG file.  I then edited that file to my taste.  All of the detail in the shadows and highlights were captured as I visualized at the scene.

As an experiment, I decided to see if I could replicate the three merged image file with the single RAW that was part of the three exposures.  No problem!  Wow!  My need for HDR just lessened.  I then tried editing the accompanying JPEG that I made (I have been using the RAW + JPEG setting) to replicate what I did with the merged DNG as well as the RAW file.  To my great surprise, I was able to pretty much exactly duplicate the three merged HDR image as well.  I think that is amazing.

Single JPEG file (click to enlarge)
In the end, I was able to produce three basically identical files (they are not totally identical since I didn't want to spend a lot of time finely tweaking every color, etc., setting but they are very, very close and work well for this illustration) from a 32-bit file created by merging three RAW images, a single RAW image (from one of those three) and the JPEG that was created along with the RAW.  Simply amazing compared to what was available to us as digital photographers only a few years ago.


This is another one of those posts that illustrates why it is important to thoroughly know your gear so when pressed or in a fast-moving or high stress situation, you don't have to guess what your gear can and cannot do.  For example, if I wanted to capture a moving object in a very high contrast scene, I may be hesitant to do so since I may have assumed that the X-T1's sensor couldn't possibly capture the entire dynamic range, when in fact, it could.  Now I know its capabilities.

Thanks for looking. Enjoy! 

Dennis A. Mook 

All content on this blog is © 2013-2016 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.

6 comments:

  1. I do bracket on occasion in high contrast situations, but find little need any more for creating an HDR with 3 or 5 images. Instead I take the first image and use the lightroom sliders to see if I can, like you did, get all the details in the blacks and whites. The answer is usually yes. If not, well then I have an HDR situation. If yes, I just dump the other files.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The manufacturers of sensors and digital cameras have really worked hard in the past several years to give us really wonderful tools.

      Delete
  2. I agree with you that the X-T1 has a capable sensor....from my experience, it seems the camera is far more likely to blow out highlights in a high contrast scene than a Bayer sensor, probably due to the higher green (luminance) pixel count. I find it useful to underexpose high contrast scenes by at least one stop and then boost the shadows in the RAW file in post (ETTR). The sensor is ISO invariant, meaning there is no penalty for working this way. It's just amazing how much shadow detail can be recovered, however, once the highlights are blown there is no bringing them back. I disagree with your assessment of JPEG dynamic range....I have encountered posterization when pushing JPEGs in post.

    Best Regards, RP

    ReplyDelete
  3. My findings are basically the same as yours. Hence, I rarely feel the need to shoot in RAW format any longer. That goes for my X-T1 and my X-Pro2. In fact, when I do a head to head comparison (shooting RAW + Jpeg Fine) of the completely processed files, I tend to choose the Jpeg as my favorite. Well done Fuji!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rick, thank you for your comment. I was pleasantly surprised that I was able to match the RAW as well as the HDR files with the JPEG. Of course, this is just one particular circumstance. As time passes, I will try this with other images to see if it holds true under many different situations.

      Delete
  4. Hi, thank you for sharing. It would be great idea to compare reade HDR image right after picture was taken (some cameras can do that) and HDR after using some of extra tools, like this http://hdreditingsoftware.com/how-to/.

    ReplyDelete