Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Go BIG Or Go Home! No Way! (Praise for M4/3)

(click to enlarge)
Go BIG or Go Home!  How many times have I heard that phrase?  Well, photographically speaking, I don't buy that philosophy.  I've proven to myself that Go Big or Go Home is no longer necessary to create wonderful photographs.  Take a look at some of my M4/3 images here and judge for yourself.

For the past three and a half years, I have primarily gone small and traveled around the U.S. extensively.  I wanted to see for myself if I could be happy with smaller, lighter and less expensive gear that would meet my photographic demand of maintaining high quality as well as giving me the versatility to photograph in about any situation I may encounter.

My tool of choice for most of my travels has been first, the Olympus E-M5, then the E-M1. The cameras are not too expensive, have a plethora of features, mate with great lenses from a variety of manufacturers, have superb image stabilization, and of course, produce excellent image quality.

For the types of photography I normally practice, the Olympus cameras have really fit the bill nicely.  They have allowed me to travel light, carry my gear longer (I'm almost 64 years of age and gear weight has kind of become an issue as I have grown older) and capture everything I have wanted to photograph.
(click to enlarge)

My travel, landscape, nature and street photography can easily be accomplished with my E-M1.  It has been for the past two years and continues to be my "go to" camera.  I can photograph where the land meets the water, the mountains, in the city, in marginal light, really just about everything I normally photograph.  Again, take a look at these photos from my website as examples of what one can accomplish with a small camera.  They have all the resolution, depth, texture, color, contrast and dynamic range that most of us will ever need.

The problem I have with APS-C or full frame sensored mirrorless cameras is, even though the camera bodies are small, the lenses have to be larger.  Some manufacturers have mitigated this fact with making smaller, but slower f/4 lenses, instead of much faster lenses.  Still, the laws of physics apply and if you have a larger sensor, you need more square millimeters of coverage with the lens' image circle, thus larger lenses.  You just can't match the size of M4/3 lenses on a one-on-one basis.

Now, I still have my Nikon D810 and several lenses.  Why?  Well, there are a few situations where M4/3 isn't quite "there" yet—but I think will be soon.  There still are a few circumstances where my big, bulky, expensive Nikons do a better job so I reserve them for just those circumstances.  When I need sophisticated flash, tracking focus for fast flying birds, really high ISO (over 6400) or the scene has a very wide dynamic range (more than 12 stops, which is rare) and HDR isn't what I really want, I go with my Nikons. Other than these particular situations, I use my smaller gear. 


(click to enlarge)

That being said, M4/3 with their phase detection autofocus on chip along with the contrast detection has really improved focus speed and tracking ability, the innovativeness of the E-M5 II and its 40mp capability, the incredible PRO lenses from Olympus, 4K video  and a new 20mp sensor from Panasonic, 10 or more frames per second shooting ability, sophisticated auto bracketing as well as all of the configurability you could ever want shows me the M4/3 manufacturers are continually stepping up their game.  I think in the next few years, there will no longer be much of a difference between larger sensor cameras and M4/3 for 95% of what we all need and do.

Another bonus now is Olympus seems to now be taking a cue from Fujifilm.  They have released several new firmware upgrades for the E-M1 that has expanded the capabilities of that camera quite a bit.  Even better, another will be released next month (v 4.0) which will give several new and useful functions, such as focus bracketing, focus stacking and a new silent mode.  Way to go Olympus!  Let's keep that philosophy for future as well as current cameras.

Go BIG or go home?  No way.  Go small and get out there!

Thanks for looking. Enjoy! 

Dennis A. Mook 

All content on this blog is © 2013-2015 Dennis A. Mook. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to point to this blog from your website with full attribution. Permission may be granted for commercial use. Please contact Mr. Mook to discuss permission to reproduce the blog posts and/or images.

5 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Dave, still have it. No plans to sell it yet. I'm waiting on Fujifilm to see 'what's next' and Adobe to better their software. On occasion I will take it out and make some images but then am reminded that Lightroom just doesn't bring out the quality I know is in those files. I end up getting disappointed once more and putting the camera and lenses away once more. I know as soon as I sell it, Fujifilm will come out with a new model and Adobe will solve all the problems with raw conversions. So I'll just hold onto it and see what happens in the next 12 months.

      Delete
  2. I fully agree with your statements, Dennis!

    In the last few months I flirted a little bit with Sony's A7-system ("big sensor in a small body"), but as you argue absolutely correctly: It's the lenses that make a system! And lenses for full frame have to be substantially bigger and heavier. And by the way: The A7-bodies do not fulfill my requirements for good handling and ergonomics - every Canon DSLR is much better in this respect!

    What really counts especially for nature- und landscape photographers ist portability, ergonomics and versatility in the field - and that's exactly what we get with mFT! And as we grow older (I was borne in 1951 ...) our back thankfully approves our decision for a lighter system too!

    My Panasonic GH4-system does anything I want producing the quality I need (you can have a look on my images on Flickr: Markus Bolliger), and with the purchase of the Nocticron 42,5mm/f 1.2 I can enter new dimensions - five stars for this stunning glass!

    Hitherto there was a lack of a high quality long tele-lens in the mFT-lineup - not any longer: In 2016 will appear a new Panleica 100-400mm zoom lens as well as a 300mm/f 4.0 from Olympus.

    My only concern about mFT is this: Will Panasonic and Olympus survive as camera makers in the mid-to-long-term? No, says the NYT in an article published in 2013! Looking with an eager eye at the market-shares, Yu Yoshida, Credit Swiss imaging analyst, claims that only Canon, Nikon and Sony fulfill the criteria necessary for survival in that business.

    Best regards from Switzerland,
    Markus

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Markus, thank you for your thoughtful comment. Also, I looked at your images on Flickr. I am jealous of the places you've been and things you've seen.

      I believe Olympus and Panasonic will be around for years to come. They are still innovating and blazing new photographic trails. I know I'll be keeping my M4/3 gear for a long time and surely adding to it.

      Dennis

      Delete
    2. I am also optimistic for the future of mFT Dennis, it is still developing in a dynamic way.

      And I also plan to upgrade my equipment, most probably with the Panleica 100-400mm expected for springtime, and the successor of my Lumix GH4-body, the GH5 coming also in 2016 (or the Olympus E-M1 Mk ii ...).

      Markus

      Delete